roman_bairn Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 We need to be hardnosed about that one. Doubtless be flogged next summer if he has a good season but we need to get a season out of him. I know our BOD would take the money though so I hope he hasnt done enough to turn heads at a higher level. Not sure we would be so quick to trade him in if we got promoted. He may also want to stay for one more season if that was the case. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just checked the table after today's games. Beat Forfar at home on Tuesday night and we win the section with a game to spare irrespective of other results. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Boyce was 500k I believe so less than that certainly. Vaulks was about 300k and I'd guess he's more valuable than Austin. Maybe 200k plus add ons. I would keep him for that money. Vaulks was just over half the money Marsh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
distresseduke Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 44 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said: Vaulks was just over half the money Marsh. So 160k Mr insider is that bout right 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 So 160k Mr insider is that bout right I think in that ball park.Accounts will be out soon so we will get an idea then 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 A steal at that price. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senor Bairn Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 How was Alex Harris today? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANEWHOPE Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Just need to watch our defending , wee bit shakey . Watson only poor show for me so far You thought Watson was poor? I thought he was pretty solid today. Thought Grant was a little wobbly. Trying to win things when there was no need. Very comfortable first half and didn't looked to troubled in the second, even though they had more possession. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano25ffc Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 You thought Watson was poor? I thought he was pretty solid today. Thought Grant was a little wobbly. Trying to win things when there was no need. Very comfortable first half and didn't looked to troubled in the second, even though they had more possession. Was a little concerning the amount of times they cut in as we were starting to stand off and getting deeper and deeper . If Caley had a decent finisher then they could have scored second half 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANEWHOPE Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Was a little concerning the amount of times they cut in as we were starting to stand off and getting deeper and deeper . If Caley had a decent finisher then they could have scored second half Agreed but to apportion the blame at Watson seems strange take for me. But we all see it differently I guess. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano25ffc Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Agreed but to apportion the blame at Watson seems strange take for me. But we all see it differently I guess. Caley were animals today , they tried to batter us. How the ref made no bookings is beyond me 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANEWHOPE Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Caley were animals today , they tried to batter us. How the ref made no bookings is beyond me Thought they were robust & physical but animals maybe stretching it. I worry about our lack of steel so thought it was good that we stood up to that side of the game. Still can't get on board the Watson comment tho [emoji848] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz FFC Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, deano25ffc said: Caley were animals today , they tried to batter us. How the ref made no bookings is beyond me The tackle on Fash and at least 1 cynical tackle 1st half were both stonewall bookings. Also a wee footnote to Baird for diving when Taiwo was near. He even won the free-kick 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano25ffc Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Thought they were robust & physical but animals maybe stretching it. I worry about our lack of steel so thought it was good that we stood up to that side of the game. Still can't get on board the Watson comment tho [emoji848] Was my view in the 1st, few times he could have controlled the ball instead of lumping it sideways . Luca was a stand out for me last week, I would take him over Watson anyday 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANEWHOPE Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Was my view in the 1st, few times he could have controlled the ball instead of lumping it sideways . Luca was a stand out for me last week, I would take him over Watson anyday Think it is pretty marginal between them to be honest. Luca of last season was out of shape & lacked mobility, hopefully will kick on this season. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
distresseduke Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Back Post Misses said: I think in that ball park. Accounts will be out soon so we will get an idea then Erm no we won't..they haven't listed exact amounts for any player sold individually in any accounts I've had 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Erm no we won't..they haven't listed exact amounts for any player sold individually in any accounts I've had Yes we will as he was the only sale and the transfer number is always listed 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
distresseduke Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 I guarantee you they will subterfuge it somehow ...they never list individual player sales 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waspie Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 34 minutes ago, deano25ffc said: Caley were animals today , they tried to batter us. How the ref made no bookings is beyond me I went along to the game today and I certainly didn't see it that way. In the first half ICT were weak and allowed themselves to be pushed around. Oakley coming on gave them more of a physical presence. But it wasn't a physical game, pretty low key I thought. Falkirk were decent, well organised and a threat up front. ICT didn't have anywhere near the same cutting edge. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinffc Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 Was a little concerning the amount of times they cut in as we were starting to stand off and getting deeper and deeper . If Caley had a decent finisher then they could have scored second half They had Baird upfront lolol 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.