Renfrewblue

I tried that too. I thought this would be a more mature place but it's the same boring chat. Banter and the like is fine but this is as boring as it gets. I've now decided to repeat my feat of a few years ago and stop coming on here again. Leave the bigots to their bile.

Both penalties given were penalties in the modern game but soft as anything for me. Rangers were honking until Moreton scored then we woke up for a bit. Considering we hit the woodwork twice and missed a couple of easy chances whilst McDonald had a good game, we should ha e strolled it. Dessers is never a no 9 for me though. Yfeko was OK but Sterling at RB was mince. The difference between him and Tav should shut up some of the Tav haters. Moreton were well organised and defended well. Plenty of experience in their team helped. They just need a few more players.

Think you've nailed it with the solid night comment. Hibs certainly looked the part going forward after the early present from their keeper. There's also definitely issues in the back line to be resolved, although a 3rd choice keeper obviously won't have helped.

To be fair, in the pre-season friendlies it's been the defence which has been a shambles so far. And they're pretty much unchanged.

But is that the be all and end all? I'm pretty sure Celtic fans don't see their club as a business.

The non OF clubs had the chance to take the veto power of the OF away in the voting structure and didn't. They effectively abdicated their chance to start levelling the playing field. So, why did they do that other than for short term financial gain for themselves?

I know it was different but the old company died and the new one took over with Celtic. So how is that different at a fundamental level?

I know about the Italian model, because as you say it happens a lot! I don't see that it matches the general Rangers fans approach or the opposite one. It's somewhat in between as they carry their Honours etc over into the new iteration of the club. It depends if you think of a team as a football club or a business. I hate the money side with a passion and would prefer a more even playing field but nobody even outside the OF wants that. Too many clubs with their own selfish narrow interests.

And in the meantime we'll be the only ones losing out, as usual.

It looks like it's been knitted in that picture.

Didn't realise he was 23. Good business all round as he obviously wasn't going to get into the Rangers team. Good luck to him. His Wiki page starts in an interesting way. "Mayo was born the day after Rod Wallace scored a hat-trick that helped Rangers beat Motherwell 6–2 in March 2000.[2] A Rangers fan from a young age, he excelled as a student and attained straight A's at High School."

It'll now be down to other companies picking up the rights as Viaplay are basically selling up. Who is going to be interested in doing that?

No, I'll leave that to the desperados with the inferiority complex. Personally I'm not entirely sure what difference the history of a club makes to the current team. It's really only a fan thing and when you really think about it, it's not actually that important.

If you think the club equals the company then you don't understand football or fans. When Celtic were saved by Wee Fergus did they become a new club because their old company died? Just interested in your opinion.

Who denies liquidation? Please point me to anyone, even among the rabid orangery, who denies Rangers were liquidated.