DanMan

A 2-1, a pen shootout and a 3-2.

Where are you pulling this "aging" squad from? Maybe 5 or 6 over 30 out of a squad of 25 ..... You do like to manipulate the truth Mr Rhubarb.

The content on this Forum would imply otherwise.

Hampden is not good for watching football. Behind the goals is miles from the action. Low down dug out side is unwatchable as the subs ets stand in front of you. The camber on the pitch doesn't help low down either side as you cannot see the far touchline. It is a terrible place to watch football.

That will be Inter & AC, Roma & Lazio Fkt then if they ever want to join the WOSFL ...

That makes no sense. Did the Bankies not win 3-0 on your "good" pitch.

So you enjoy teams shooting up and down a hill. Away and give me peace. Good level? Darvel, hardly any rain in the last 2 weeks, but needs a pitch inspection. Glens, a mud heap at the best of times.

How many "well maintained" natural surfaces are there at this level? Apart from Talbot, which is always exceptional, there aren't too many others, especially this deep in the season. So if you are asking would I rather watch my team on a good quality astro, on on the "problem pitch" that is Darvel, or the mountain slope that is Beith, then yes I would rather watch on astro.

One of them

Is it not 4 times in a row in the league?

I think most teams treasurers are delighted when Clydebank roll into town. Still if you don't see that benefit, maybe arrange for Clydebank fans to get into Darvel for free next month.

I don't suppose Clydebank & Yoker operate a dual contract with players either. Maybe, just maybe you shouldn't have laid a pitch that full time clubs couldn't afford, or indeed kitted out the finest changing rooms in Scotland. Especially with a very poor home support, unless of course the Big Teams are in town to boost the coffers.

Away and howl at the moon .......

1. Do St. Cadocs have experience of getting things over the line. 2. Whilst I agree Beith are slight favourites, they have already lost the same number of games this season as Clydebank, so maybe better with points on the board. 3. If you think Talbot deserved to win on Saturday, you must have been in The Lovat at opening time. Although, if Talbot are going to influence the eventual winners, then I am glad we have played them twice already (and beat them twice). 4. Not much of a secret meeting if you know about it.

For what it's worth, my take on this is quite simple. The "powers that be " cannot do anything other than award the game to Glenafton. Somebody earlier in the thread summed it up. A few key players missing with injury/ suspension, turn up with 7, have an injury and abandon the game. Then get a replay when everybody is back. It cannot be allowed to happen. Time for the blazers to show a bit of leadership.