Paganshoplifter

You don't necessarily need to have a fever: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2238473-you-could-be-spreading-the-coronavirus-without-realising-youve-got-it/

I strongly suspect there's something driving the way they lead with 'next-manager-to-berate' on so many episodes. Maybe it's not focus groups, maybe they just monitor how many people tune in when they advertise they're going to have a go at a manager vs. a good news /balanced lead. I'd be astonished if the subjects of the programmes aren't thought out in this way,

Generally think Sportsound is good, but to spend the first 25 mins lambasting a manager - and hardly even commenting on the actual game (Hearts Rangers - which to be fair I didn't see) before finally talking positive about the team that won annoys me. How shit were Hearts in that game - that they won - to deserve this? It just seems that the only thing they can lead with these days is how bad a certain manager is. I guess they've done the focus groups or whatever and that's what people want to listen to.. Wasn't there some good news about Hearts's performance to be talking about - at least slightly countering all the negative stuff they've been saying about them?

Ç