Poo

"Authoritative sources" Like who? The DaIly Mail? The Daily Express? The Sun?...... Basically all of the sources that don't actually back up anything they say, but people like you are idiodic enough to believe anyway.

Because the authorities are a real trustworthy bunch who never sweep things under the rug to save their own ass.

Still here m9 xx

No he wasn't. Talking left doesn't make you left. His motives were wicked right from the start, hidden behind smiles and handshakes.

What did Alex Salmond lie about? This should be good....

That fat b*****d at 2:46 looks like he's just escaped from prison. Scary stuff.

Why the wrist? Just tattoo it on the back of peoples heads.

WOS is showing the whole thing. The Daily Mail is using selective statistics as you admit yourself. It's morons like you who read papers like the Daily Mail, Express and Telegraph who take a whataboutery attitude, because you know what you're reading isn't giving you the complete picture. Just selective facts while leaving out the rest in order to create a narritive bias. But as long as it reads #SNPbad, you don't really care if it isn't accurate when compared to the complete picture. You don't even consider the fact that their travelling expenses are higher, because they have far greater involvement over debates and voting at westminster than the previous labconlib arrangement.

If the knew that, then the result would have been "remain". The result is always as they plan it.

It doesn't fit the narrative mate.

I see McSpreader has resurfaced

Big bad Bob and his Chlamydia sidekick would like a wee meeting with some of the gang.

I hope those things are asbestos proof. Watching out for the big cloud in the sky.

"It's ok to be racist because other people are" type argument. Pathetic.

Should we be maintaining things that are historically significant when it's things we're better off forgetting? Why hold onto things that only remind us of the shame of the human race?