Jump to content

Skittles

Gold Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

-7 Poor

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Law is easy to understand, Just study your countries constitution as the whole basis of law and governance is written in it. For Scotland i can highlight theses most important ones Declaration of Arbroath 1320, Claim of rights 1689, A claim of rights for Scotland 1988, Act of Union Articles 3 & 18. Last but not least the " US Senate Resolution 155 of 10 November 1997 in regards to American declaration of independence" There is a reason why culturally the Scots have a deep rooted mentality of being free despite being & feeling like we are being dictated too. During my studies fueled by my English bigotry and hatred for Westminister I found that the people of Scotland where indeed protected more so than the English. Parliamentary Sovereignty is solely an English ideology but even at that, the term is manipulated. When people think Parliament they think of a building and members of it who are sovereign. Westminister is just that, a building and those members do not represent it and definitely not themselves but the people, so people are indeed sovereign. 1.Origin of Parliament as whole was a creation of people rising up against a then corrupt establishment crown and church. Parliament/Parley-ment means Parley: is a discussion or conference, especially one between enemies over terms of a truce or other matters. –Ment : The action or result of what is denoted by the verb. (you may have heard the term Parley mentioned in pirates of the Caribbean ) Rights are the law and that’s why they apply equally regardless of social status/title. Harm injury and loss is the principle of common law, no harm, no foul, no victim, no crime. Under common law you will get a jury. Legal system does not work on that principle, it works on the presumptions, you will not get a jury as there's no victim although i'm sure you will pay. Prohibition was the first major legal infringement on everyone. The legal ability to be punished for potentially taking a risk to oneself, whilst redefining what the harm/risk could be.In legal terms you can be both the accused and the defendant, the victim and the criminal, being penalized on behalf of the state. Obtaining a record for a crimeless act in the process. (It was Interesting studing earlier prohibition and how it created organised crime giving rise to the most infamous gangster in American history Al Capone ) When you are the accused in a legal proceeding if you win you do not win the case as the case was against you. In fact the case gets thrown out which prevents the people from setting a legal precedent.
  2. Benefits? Studying law itself and knowing the difference between a legal ruling and a lawful one. List of benefits you could weigh is no fines, no council tax, no income tax, no legal convictions. Being sovereign makes you legally immune, This principle is commonly expressed by the popular legal maxim "rex non potest peccare". Being sovereign does not make you above the law, those idiots around the world are interpretating it as you are free to do whatever the f**k you want to anyone lmfao My background is in historical texts including but not excluding things such as national constitutions, declarations and treaties . The precursor of laws that govern societies and legal obligation gained by consent. Knowledge of laws in public, private, trust, tort, criminal, common, commercial. Other interests are psychology in such subjects as objective and subjective reasoning, critical thinking, Stockholm syndrome and Dissociative disorders. A fascination in writing itself such as things like etymology, the origins of words in which their meanings have changed throughout history. Legalese which is legal writing that’s secretive and arbitrary. "Nobody knows what you're banging on about as you appear to have a firmer grasp on the sauce than the English language. " Go educate yourself then, i'm just here to point you in the right direction! Namely at the sources that those claim to have sovereignty from.
  3. Yeah, cause I'm calling you all out on your insulting bullshit. If you all want to be subjects or slaves by all means go on but don't fucking bring people down to your acceptable standards of life. It's not a movement you pleb it's constitutional, it's your historical rights gained by winning major battles, it goes as far back as 1320. Only complete arseholes would ignore facts and evidence, which you have already stated doesn't matter.
  4. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/12/nicola-sturgeon-declares-scottish-people-have-sovereignty-as-lef/ Speaking on behalf of her 63 MSPs, the First Minister said: “The Scottish National Party pledges loyalty to the people of Scotland, in line with the Scottish constitutional tradition of the sovereignty of the people of Scotland.” Patrick Harvie, the Scottish Green co-convener, said that this party’s priority was to serve the Scottish people “who are sovereign. And that we support the principle of an elected head of state.” How does it feel to be an uneducated moron? Fucking waste of space, if you ain't sovereign you're a slave, f**k 100s years ago they understood the fucking difference. Why don't you educate yourself by listening to it being spoken about in Holyrood itself.
  5. Nah no point really, I think you people have made your point very clear I base all my statements, arguments, claims on relevant factually evidence not opinions unlike most people. There's shit everywhere and if you aren’t willing to shift through it to get to the truth then you're quite happily rolling around in it. So keep rolling
  6. How can any of you c***s actually consider being scottish? wait no your mental attitude appears to resonate with those filthy remainers. f**k sake was i the only person brought up not to trust politicians never mind the government. You really need to wake up
  7. What so you can't read? Declaration Abroath & A Claim of Right for Scotland Shows sovereignty lies with the individual. These's documents are recognised world wide and still hold true to this day. I explained where and how statutory tools are enacted through secondary legislation and how to prove they are invalid. All Government sourced. Article 18 of the Treaty of Union Is famously known to conflict with public vs private rights of the scottish people.
  8. The ultimate ignorance is the rejection of something you know nothing about yet refuse to investigate. Dr. Wayne Dyer You have not got a clue? I got you the best answer to point you in the right direction. Everything i posted is FACTS even a quick google check will prove that. Do you own investigation I'm not telling you to take my word. Evidence is right there and you still refute it lmao i wonder who fucking eejit is then. instantly dismissed lol couple of fannies who think they know it all without investigating.
  9. Scottish Sovereign Declaration of Arbroath The Declaration made a number of rhetorical points: that Scotland had always been independent, indeed for longer than England; that Edward I of England had unjustly attacked Scotland and perpetrated atrocities; that Robert the Bruce had delivered the Scottish nation from this peril; and, most controversially, that the independence of Scotland was the prerogative of the Scottish people, rather than the King of Scots. In fact it stated that the nobility would choose someone else to be king if Bruce proved to be unfit in maintaining Scotland's independence. Some have interpreted this last point as an early expression of 'popular sovereignty' – that government is contractual and that kings can be chosen by the community rather than by God alone. A Claim of Right for Scotland was a document crafted by the Campaign for a Scottish Assembly in 1988, declaring the sovereignty of the Scottish people. It was signed by all then-serving Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs, with the exception of Tam Dalyell (Labour), a strident opponent of devolution. The list of signatories included several MPs who would later attain high office, including future prime minister Gordon Brown, future chancellor Alistair Darling, and future leaders of the Liberal Democrats Charlie Kennedy and Menzies Campbell. The Claim of Right reads- We, gathered as the Scottish Constitutional Convention, do hereby acknowledge the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of Government best suited to their needs, and do hereby declare and pledge that in all our actions and deliberations their interests shall be paramount. We further declare and pledge that our actions and deliberations shall be directed to the following ends: To agree a scheme for an Assembly or Parliament for Scotland; To mobilize Scottish opinion and ensure the approval of the Scottish people for that scheme; and To assert the right of the Scottish people to secure implementation of that scheme. The argument was based upon the terms of Article 18 of the Treaty of Union, the terms of which are familiar to historians, legal academics and commentators and to the courts which have considered its import on a number of occasions. The Article reads as follows: “That the Laws concerning Regulation of Trade, Customs and such Excises to which Scotland is by virtue of this Treaty to be lyable be the same in Scotland from and after the Union as in England, and that all other Lawes in use within the Kingdom of Scotland do after the Union and notwithstanding thereof remain the same as before (except such as are contrary to or inconsistent with this Treaty) but alterable by the Parliament of Great Britain With this difference betwixt the laws concerning publick Right, Policy and Civil Government and those which concern private Right That the Laws which concern publick Right Policy and Civil Government may be made the same throughout the whole United Kingdom but that no alteration be made in Laws which concern private Right except for the evident utility of the subjects within Scotland.” <---- In parliamentary systems of government, primary legislation and secondary legislation, also referred to as delegated legislation, are two forms of law, created respectively by the legislative and executive branches of government. The executive branch is commonly known as His/her Majesty's Government (HMG). It is led by the Prime Minister and the Cabinet and is made up of a collection of about a hundred ministers who carry out the laws made by Parliament and who run the government and the country day-to-day. The judicial branch enforces the law. Primary legislation is law made by the legislative branch of government. This contrasts with secondary legislation, which is usually made by the executive branch. Secondary (or delegated) legislation must be authorized by primary legislation, and conform to boundaries it has laid down. Secondary legislation (also referred to as delegated legislation) is law made by an executive authority under powers delegated from by an enactment of primary legislation, which grants the executive agency power to implement and administer the requirements of that primary legislation. The power to pass delegated legislation is defined and limited by the primary legislation that delated those powers; if the subordinate authority acts beyond its remit, its acts will be invalid or ultra vires. <---- Forms of secondary legislation in the United Kingdom include: Statutory instruments – made in a variety of forms, most commonly Orders in Council, regulations, rules and orders. The form to be adopted is usually set out in the enabling Act. US Senate Resolution 155 of 10 November 1997 states that the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that inspirational document. RESOLUTION Designating April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day to recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by Scottish Americans to the United States. Whereas April 6 has a special significance for all Americans, and especially those Americans of Scottish descent, because the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that inspirational document; Whereas this resolution honors the major role that Scottish Americans played in the founding of this Nation, such as the fact that almost half of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were of Scottish descent, the Governors in 9 of the original 13 States were of Scottish ancestry,Scottish Americans successfully helped shape this country in its formative years and guide this Nation through its most troubled times; Whereas this resolution recognizes the monumental achievements and invaluable contributions made by Scottish Americans that have led to America's preeminence in the fields of science, technology, medicine, government, politics, economics, architecture, literature, media, and visual and performing arts; Whereas this resolution commends the more than 200 organizations throughout the United States that honor Scottish heritage, tradition, and culture,representing the hundreds of thousands of Americans of Scottish descent, residing in every State, who already have made the observance of Tartan Day on April 6 a success; Whereas These numerous individuals, clans, societies, clubs, and fraternal organizations do not let the great contributions of the Scottish people go unnoticed: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the Senate designates April 6 of each year as ``National Tartan Day. Before someone starts shouting then how come none of the stuff has worked or been documented of a sovereign winning their cases. It's so simple you will feel stupid but hey you are not legally trained and i will not hold that against you. There is such a thing called LEGAL PRECEDENT. Cases usually get thrown out if it contradicts statutory law as it would create a legal precedent and the case itself is against you, the accused/defendant you are not there to win anything. Scots have always been free that is the point. You could say we invented the very notion of independence and individual sovereignty and the right to self determination. Ignorance of the law excuses no one. Doesn't matter that we have factual evidence that cannot be denied of why Scots are Sovereign, if enough people believe it to be a lie it becomes the truth by default.
×
×
  • Create New...