Gold Members
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

52 Excellent

About GordonS

  • Rank
    Sunday League Starter

Profile Information

  • My Team
    Linlithgow Rose

Recent Profile Visitors

218 profile views
  1. British football is pretty unusual in Europe in not having youth sides in the senior set-up. In Spain they play in both leagues and cups. I'm still against it but I don't understand where the vitriol comes from, like it's some crazy, dangerous, anti-footballing idea. Countries with a far, far better record than us in developing players do it. Scotland is singularly shite at turning decent young players into top adult players, so maybe we should be more open minded about how to sort that.
  2. It is. http://www.youthfootballscotland.co.uk/gots/item/19101-u20-s-make-debut-appearances-in-irb-bru-challenge-cup.html http://dufc.co/news/irn-bru-cup/ I could go on.
  3. Devil's advocate here, but the point of the colt teams isn't that they're genuine contenders for the cup, or that they bring in fans. The point is to give the young players at Premier league teams the chance to play serious football against grown-ups, to help them develop and progress to their first teams - and maybe into the national team. How far it achieves that, and whether it's an objective that's important enough to risk the sporting integrity of the competition, is a matter for debate. But crowds and results aren't really the point. Personally I'm still against it - I think this competition has a real future as being for those in tiers 2-5 of the pyramid.
  4. Not exactly what I had in mind at the start - "why do Medda have XI in their name" is a daft laddie question; "who played on ash parks in the 1920s" probably qualifies as a tougher question! Brilliant read though, the history of Junior football has so many quirks and tales. Has anyone ever written a book collecting the best of them?
  5. The ball almost always ends up in the net when an attacker rounds the goalkeeper and there's no-one else between them and the goal. 'Probable' is definitely good enough for me. And besides, a higher proportion of those moments end in goals than penalties do, so it's fairer than giving a penalty.
  6. Can't sleep cos of the heat and I stumbled across this work of utter genius. I think I've woken the house!
  7. I don't know why people think the timing thing suits TV. Just now they have a very good idea of when a match will end and can schedule accordingly; keeping count of game time would lead to much bigger variations in when matches end, as has happened in rugby. The France v Wales 6 Nations match this year went on so long they had to delay kick-off in the Ireland v England match following it. It's not an idea I much like, but stopping the clock for injuries, subs and goals would take the sting out of timewasting and be fairer. And if they're doing it they should definitely connect it to stadium clocks. Whether things are applicable at lower levels doesn't bother me. In the Junior league cup early rounds they don't even have linesmen. I watch a lot of rugby and it doesn't seem to cause any problems that non-professional levels don't have access to video replays, etc. Same happens in tennis with Hawkeye too. I've always been in favour of penalty goals, not just for handball, but for any time a goal would probably have been scored. I've seen players taken down outside the box by the goalie, with no defender behind them, denying a near certain goal and it not even leading to a penalty. It works pretty well in rugby and I think it would be no more controversial in football than any other refereeing decision. Taking free-kicks to yourself - imagine that this had always been allowed and we were debating preventing it. That would be mad, we'd see it as creating an incentive to foul. I'm in favour of it, I don't think it would make a massive difference in practice but I think we'd see a lot of tap-and-go free kicks, speeding the game up a little where it suits the team that have been fouled. Goal kicks should be taken from whatever side is closer for the goalkeeper.
  8. Never heard of them before. Magnificent. Bonnyrigg's pitch slope could qualify them for the same name.
  9. Does that apply to Shotts Bon Accord as well - is that a common name for pits or something?
  10. On names, anyone know where 'Bon Accord' comes from?
  11. Rose, Violet, Primrose, Talbot, Ladeside, Meadow, Victoria, Winton Rovers, Panmure, Swifts, Harp... It's in the senior game too - Hibernian, Heart of Midlothian, Thistle, Queen of the South, St Mirren and St Johnstone... Scottish football is full of romantic names, many with great stories behind them. So much better than the daft, butch names you get in other sports.
  12. You guys were robbed blind that day. Hope you all enjoyed it nonetheless, and have great memories - the game at Ross County is one of my best memories as a Rose fan, but we had that wonderful second goal to celebrate and left feeling that it was a fair result.
  13. If you're looking for a match, how about women's games? It's the Scottish Cup tomorrow, tie of the round is between Spartans and Glasgow City though that's obviously not where you're looking for. Fixtures for tomorrow are here: http://scotwomensfootball.com/cup-competitions/sse-scottish-womens-cup/
  14. If you weren't a Bo'nesser I might have believed that. I've been to Bonnyrigg's ground and they don't seem like a significantly bigger club than Linlithgow Rose, but not knowing the history I didn't know if they were bigger in the past or whatever. So is it genuine, irony, something to tease Linlithgow Rose fans or what?