Huistrinho

AFAIK it wasn't a "temporary licence", it was a full license conditional on the oldco SPL share being transferred to Dundee (which has now been done). There's no problem with them employing players (as any other business) in the meantime. I'm not sure if this has prevented them registering players before today, however the SFL trialist rules make this a non-issue when it comes to actually fielding them in games.

Circulation figures for the Daily Record (and by implication, his job). Surely that's been clear for months?

You can indeed ask; RangersMedia would be the place to do so. Here you're just helping this thread degenerate into circlejerk central.

Great. There's never going to be a better time to try and stamp it out. I've long been in favour of a points deduction system for bad crowd behaviour. Has anyone in the game or media ever mooted the idea?

Armageddon is a lot prettier than I expected...

On your first point, if you're looking to buy a business it would be really stupid to add any more money to the CVA pot than the minimum necessary to either A) secure a CVA, or B) get the administrators to agree to your backup plan (or "real" plan) to secure the assets. On your second point, you are 100% correct. I'm amazed that the only person to make the leap into "Investigative Scottish Football Journalist" throughout this whole debacle has been an English war correspondent with no prior familiarity with the Scottish game. Worse, there's been no attempt by the MSM to up their game in response, and often an air of "you're not from around these parts...". You might add Mark Daly as an exception, but his second documentary was padded out with so much suggestion, implication, and bad narrative that he went down in my estimation. Even the Scottish pundits who come out with some credit, such as English, Cosgrove, and Spence, do so only because they were expressing "true" public opinion, not because of any investigative breakthroughs of their own. There's certainly a gap in the market waiting to be filled by someone with the necessary journalistic talents.

You do realise this isn't a BBC run website, right? You might have better luck contacting them directly.

IMO, there will be an agreement that any punishment will not direct affect Sevco (financial or suspension). I'm quite sure title stripping will still be on the cards.

How do you come to that conclusion? It says they'll proceed after the verdict on the big tax case has been delivered.

The Spartans

You do realise that's what we were already talking about, don't you? It's as it should be (and there's a good argument that it's higher than it should be). You're not going to find any complaining here

Haha, I've already made my thoughts on this perfectly clear over the past 1000 pages or so. However, I suggest you take your issue up with the BBC directly Edit: missing words.

That's the company name. The old company was "The Rangers Football Club PLC", the new one will be "The Rangers Football Club Ltd." I'm sure the team will come to be known just as "Rangers" as before.

Haha!, I can't imagine the emails they're about to receive for that one. Clearly somebody in the office taking the piss - I don't expect it to last very long.

By that logic you've just written off Hibs' Scottish cup win, however I don't see people reminding you of that via the medium of song every weekend. Time will pass, people will forget, and nobody will care to listen to those who complain otherwise whether you like it or not. Such is life.