FrugalNory

100% slaver. Probably never even been to Perth let alone a Saints game [emoji57]

I think so. But I'm off the new found opinion that there is no rule, legal or otherwise, that cannot be bent, broken or simply ignored to suit the purposes of a few vested interests.

I can understand Sandaza going for the security of a bumper contract for a longer period than we could offer in a division where he'll hardly break a sweat. I'm still fairly dissapointed in him though, he has the potential to play at a much higher level and achieve an awful lot more. It makes me wonder if there's some truth in the rumours that an imminent reconstruction will shunt The Rangers closer to the top league in the next year or two.

Well I'm afraid a "purile level" is about my level of understanding I'm afraid. Apologies. The suggestion is that the history is an "asset" that can be bought or sold. Tart it up any way you want, that just doesn't really stack up. Even at a nuclear physics level of understanding.

I don't care if they inherit the oldcos history or not. But I am extremely perplexed about all of the hullabaloo prior to liquidation. Banners about "no to newco", Sending Bill Miller packing, Charles Green stating on radio that the "history goes" if the CVA isn't agreed and the actual bother of arranging a CVA at all. Why all that fuss if they just keep the history after liquidating anyway? What was the point? BTW, how many trophies did third lanark win? Can I buy their history trophy wins and transfer them to the Saintees? Thats how it works right?

Now that's enough of that . A terrible way to slander one of the main contributers to the tabloid that "has been setting the agenda" on the Rangers situation. :angry: :huh: :lol: :lol:

We'll see what tomorrow brings, but I echo your sentiments.

Because they resisted enormous pressure and bullying to vote them into SFL1. Our chairman couldn't even make a decision, the SFL did. You may not agree with it and you make a good point. But in comparison to our SPL clubs, the SFL have performed comparitively well.

Reread the original post. It was about SFL fans, no mention of an SFL board. The SFL gans have every Right to feel proud of their clubs actually taking a decision that our SPL clubs continuosly shirked. Or do you disagree with that? If so, why?

Apparently on the understanding the SFL looked after them for a year. The SFL have done well, they were asked to make an impossible decision not of their making. Yhey didn't f**k about, they did it and they stand by it. Our SPL chairman? Postponed everything, eventually palming it off to the SFL. The SFL vote a way they don't like and now their threatening a reversal. The SFL Have every right to hold the moral high ground IMO. We however don't if the rumours about tomorrow are true.

Aye, Div 3 will be a breeze with a white elephant training facility, a 50k seater stadiums running costs and wages for Mcculloch / Wallace. Especially after selling 500 ST's so far. If anyones getting flushed, Sevco are probably going round the U bend first.

Shame, its the same standard as Traynor and Jacksons "journalism"

You nicked that from the record didn't you?

Teflon Traynor always has his public purse funded radio show to fall back on. He'll be awrite....

Good stuff from Utd. Hearts also get pass marks on sport sound.