Jacksgranda - Viewing Profile

Jacksgranda's Profile User Rating:

Reputation: 188 Excellent

Group:: Gold Members
Active Posts:: 2,261 (1.99 per day)
Most Active In:: SPL General Chatter (654 posts)
Joined:: 18-April 09
Profile Views:: 3,823
Last Active:: Today, 16:17
Currently:: Viewing Board Index

My Information

Member Title:: First Division Regular
Age:: 59 years old
Birthday:: November 20, 1952
Gender:: Male
Location:: Northern Ireland
My Team:: Aberdeen

Contact Information

E-mail:: Private
Website URL:: http://

Latest Visitors

Tamdunk
19 May 2012 - 11:55
Saltire
08 May 2012 - 20:21
saint dave
30 Apr 2012 - 19:39
The Real Saints
25 Apr 2012 - 14:06
Hipster Dufus
23 Apr 2012 - 10:20

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Catholic Rangers supporters?

Today, 15:53

Bigmouth Strikes Again, on 27 May 2012 - 15:20, said:
Used to work with an older guy who was a catholic and supported Rangers, he was sound as well, no boasting or any of that shite, he said he could never sign his surname (Kelly) when he went into any Rangers clubbie....pretty sad really.

All the Kellys I know are protestants.
In Topic: The Big Rangers Administration Thread - Keep all chat in here!

Today, 13:08

Paramour, on 27 May 2012 - 12:59, said:
No chance. Neither of Goram's personalities could count that high.

But if you added the two of them together......
In Topic: The Big Rangers Administration Thread - Keep all chat in here!

Today, 12:50

Phew...finally caught up.

Is No8 possibly Andy Goram?
In Topic: The Big Rangers Administration Thread - Keep all chat in here!

Yesterday, 17:05

Sergeant Wilson, on 25 May 2012 - 19:15, said:
All we need now is Ad Lib to tell them to desist or refrain from this heinous action.

Which when they fail to so do, they are then strongly requested to desist or refrain from aforementioned heinious, indeed, reprehensible, action..
In Topic: The Big Rangers Administration Thread - Keep all chat in here!

25 May 2012 - 15:35

donj, on 25 May 2012 - 14:37, said:
What happens if the Court agree that the SFA panel did not have the right to bestow the transfer ban punishment.
Does it mean they have to use the sanction they do have and just wind them up as they considered this at the panel but cut it to a years transfer ban out of the goodness f their hearts.

(I'm just catching up at the minute.)