Jump to content

Mr Mojo Rising

Gold Members
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Mr Mojo Rising last won the day on November 11 2010

Mr Mojo Rising had the most liked content!

Reputation

81 Excellent

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • My Team
    Celtic
  1. <br /><br /><br />It goes without saying that Celtic would be financially stronger with rangers, but even if it meant short term downsizing, I'm certain rangers' demise would not threaten the very existence of Celtic. After a transitional period of no rangers, Celtic would find themselves in much more competitive league. If league expansion was also brought in, teams would only have two games against a team with vastly superior resources rather than the 9-12 that they currently have. Other sides could genuinely compete for the title whereas, at the moment, only two teams have any chance of winning the spl.
  2. <br /><br /><br />Yeah, Hearts and Celtic are the main two I'd have my doubts about. Hearts because romanov is a loose cannon and might vote no even if it was financially beneficial. Celtic because they'd probably feel they could cope short term and because of a fear of the reaction from their own supporters.
  3. Right here's what I think will happen (I'm by no means an expert so someone tell me if what I think is nonsense or not)... rangers will get wound up with Whyte as the secured creditor getting almost all of the revenue. A phoenix club will get set up, probably "Glasgow rangers". Even though the former club would cease i think there would be a campaign to allow "new rangers" to take the league place of "old rangers". Even though in an ideal world, every club in the spl would be glad to see the back of rangers, in the short term I think some clubs might think they need rangers if their absence led to tv deals, sponsorship deals, etc getting ripped up. Some clubs may not have the short term finances to weather the storm of a rangersless league. So my question is: "would your team vote rangers in?" (not "would you want your team to vote rangers in?"). As far as I'm aware, it would require 11 votes in favour but I genuinely believe they'd have a good chance of getting the votes they'd need.
  4. Anyone know what like the M8 is today? Really not keen on driving but the trains are off so nae choice.
  5. I was looking out my window there and I didn't see one gritter, snow plough or emergency service vehicle. COULD NOT BELIEVE IT! Absolute disgrace!
  6. http://www.iilemi.com/13084/2/Watch-WWE-Survivor-Series/ Looks alright so far.
  7. Its only shit in the sense that none of the feuds have been built up well/at all apart from the main event but its one of the most unpredictable ppvs in ages, the only cert imo is a sheamus win and for that reason alone, its something to look forward to.
  8. I HOPE... at various points in the match Barret and Cena square up and have words, gradually building the tension. Then towards the end, with the tension seemingly at breaking point, Cena grabs a chair giving the impression of him saying "f**k it, I don't care about the consequences". He goes for Barrett who ducks and he takes out Orton who is right behind him. Initially, it looks like Cena is devastated with what he did but then a slow sly grin comes across his face before he embraces Barrett. Anything after that would be good, but best scenario would be Cena to do a quick 3 count but with Orton's foot just under the ropes, really really subtle so hopefully not too many people notice. Have Nexus celebrate in the ring but then the next night on Raw it's revealed that Orton is still champion. With Cena then a fully committed member of Nexus, things would get very interesting. I THINK... Cena will reluctantly let Barrett win, then hit him with an attitude adjustment setting up a feud between them which will lead to Cena becoming champion again. It will be shite.
  9. I think he will, due to a few possible reasons... 1. Cena losing then reluctantly joining nexus but then solidifing a heel turn at survivor series by backing them up would work well and set up a title match with orton. It would also help improve Nexus merchandise sales. Alternatively, if they couldn't bear to turn him heel, I tihnk he'll still lose, get a title match with Orton and rather than Nexus backing Cena up, they screw him and back up Orton. Orton becomes heel again, which suits him. I heard him in an interview once saying he'd rather never ever turn face.
  10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4RohNaSGJk I loved the build up to that, was so gutted when Foley lost and usually I'm pretty indifferent to how it goes.
  11. Is accent sounds like a perfectly normal affluent Ayshire/Newton Mearns accent. It just isn't very intimidating.
  12. I really rate the one where Booker T calls Hulk Hogan a nigger but that has probably been posted on this thread several times. Its when he puts his head in his hands right after it like "f**k sake, I just called Hulk Hogan a nigger" that gets me every time.
  13. I've watched very little wrestling in recent years but decided to watch raw last night. It seems to me that there is either no GM (I don't know if it had been confirmed in a previous show that there definitely is one) or it's Michael Cole. Either there is no GM and Cole is kidding on about emails so he can do as he pleases or it's Cole and he's stringing people along so he seems like a major heel when it's eventually revealed. If it's Cole and he keeps making out it's Austin, you could maybe expect a one off appearance from Austin when he's promoting his film where he comes in and stunners Cole.
  14. do U hink we cn go far in champo leeg this season.?

    well dun for supportin eh hoops.

    x

×
×
  • Create New...