[cut me open and i'm blue]

Can any1 explain the selection today? Queens were awful 2nd half and deserved nothing more than draw. Big Sean into midfield/defence. Dobbs left on bench. On a positive keeper looked okay!! Commanded area didn't have much o a chance with goals. Prob our 7 strong defence obscured his view! thoughts???

[FC_1919]

cut me open and i'm blue, on Jan 3 2009, 20:01, said:

Can any1 explain the selection today? Queens were awful 2nd half and deserved nothing more than draw. Big Sean into midfield/defence. Dobbs left on bench. On a positive keeper looked okay!! Commanded area didn't have much o a chance with goals. Prob our 7 strong defence obscured his view! thoughts???

Strange bringing O'Conner on in the centre of the park, he is just a big akward boy with limited ability IMO.

[cut me open and i'm blue]

FC_1919, on Jan 3 2009, 21:02, said:

Strange bringing O'Conner on in the centre of the park, he is just a big akward boy with limited ability IMO.

gr8 at holding ball up, and a good stike partner 4 dobbs. nearly gave away pen, defending not his strong point, as ne1 can see

[dumfries.....boys]

We can ask Chis at A.G.M. ON 6 JAN what the hell is going on .

[vikingTON]

He put him on in midfield as we were just launching aimless high balls into the penalty box. Irons then checked Chisholm by introducing Paartalu.

[kirkyblue2]

Chisholm is a clown and a negative clown living on last year's cup run and the sooner Rae and the BOD see it the better.

[The Arch]

FC_1919, on Jan 3 2009, 20:02, said:

Strange bringing O'Conner on in the centre of the park, he is just a big akward boy with limited ability IMO.

Chisholm's decision making in the past has appeared a bit off, but this sounds like a terrible idea. Beyond terrible infact.

Do most Queens fans want him gone now?

[cut me open and i'm blue]

kirkyblue2, on Jan 3 2009, 21:09, said:

Chisholm is a clown and a negative clown living on last year's cup run and the sooner Rae and the BOD see it the better.

just dont c his logic. unsure of what is best 4 qosfc. stay or go??

last years starting 11 rarely changed

[queenslad]

Don't think there was much wrong with the team selection today. To go into a two goal lead away from home takes some doing with the two 'newboys' Wilson and Arkbuckle scoring one each. How many goals have O'conner and Dobbie scored in last dozen games (not many).

The problems seemed to come with tiring players and being forced back by Morton chasing the game. If Tosh, Arkbuckle and Wilson had 90 mins in them it may have resulted in a different result.

An encouraging point away from home against a form team. Yes gutted to lose a 95 min 'winner' but we will do the same against someone else before the season is over

[man in the know]

you queens boys have short memories be patient the man knows what he is doing have faith the short term answer is always the same sack the manager, new man arrives does not like what he sees players go and players come in and you are no better off. Better the devil you know as opposed to the devil you dont. Davie and the board know the score the clubs fortunes are in good hands. Another year in the first division will do the queens wonders

[cut me open and i'm blue]

man in the know, on Jan 3 2009, 21:23, said:

you queens boys have short memories be patient the man knows what he is doing have faith the short term answer is always the same sack the manager, new man arrives does not like what he sees players go and players come in and you are no better off. Better the devil you know as opposed to the devil you dont. Davie and the board know the score the clubs fortunes are in good hands. Another year in the first division will do the queens wonders

5 in 33 points, thats not form that'll keep us in 1st. i'd be happy with survival. no one is calling for his head-but something has to change.

[C B]

cut me open and i'm blue, on Jan 3 2009, 20:01, said:

Can any1 explain the selection today? Queens were awful 2nd half and deserved nothing more than draw. Big Sean into midfield/defence. Dobbs left on bench. On a positive keeper looked okay!! Commanded area didn't have much o a chance with goals. Prob our 7 strong defence obscured his view! thoughts???

How the mighty have fallen I couldn't believe Queens were time wasting with 15minutes to go in the FIRST HALF ! Chisholm can't be untouchable now? Surely? That was dreadful stuff today from a team that gave us 3 lessons at Cappielow last year

[Weekender]

Both managers were clearly envolved in some sort of "Who can bam up the fans better" competition.

Our manager's tactics were shit aswell.

[cut me open and i'm blue]

queenslad, on Jan 3 2009, 21:23, said:

Don't think there was much wrong with the team selection today. To go into a two goal lead away from home takes some doing with the two 'newboys' Wilson and Arkbuckle scoring one each. How many goals have O'conner and Dobbie scored in last dozen games (not many).

The problems seemed to come with tiring players and being forced back by Morton chasing the game. If Tosh, Arkbuckle and Wilson had 90 mins in them it may have resulted in a different result.

An encouraging point away from home against a form team. Yes gutted to lose a 95 min 'winner' but we will do the same against someone else before the season is over

got to disagree, selection was poor. Robertson must do something special in training because he doesn't on a sat. Weatherstone on bench yet we play two left backs. Dobbie the best finisher in the league left on bench. Arbuckle who has been out 4 6wks starts on lone striker role. Need i go on??....

[cut me open and i'm blue]

BluebirdTon, on Jan 3 2009, 21:32, said:

Both managers were clearly envolved in some sort of "Who can bam up the fans better" competition.

Our manager's tactics were shit aswell.

we win

[SaltyTON]

A deserved point as Queens were gifted two goals by the non-defenders (Walker and Finlayson) not bothering to try and stop them.

Oh, and since I know you'll read this.

Get it right fucking up you, Reidy!

[kirkyblue2]

cut me open and i'm blue, on Jan 3 2009, 20:45, said:

we win

When?

[vikingTON]

Chisholm is an imbecile. Dobbie being left on the sidelines probably won drew us the match.

[cut me open and i'm blue]

kirkyblue2, on Jan 3 2009, 21:57, said:

When?

good point-maybe next wk when we play JT upfront and dobbs starts in goal

[palmy_cammy]

zupa, on Jan 4 2009, 00:07, said:

Queens NO wins in 9.
Morton won 5 from 6.
You are the most negative "fan" on this site.
What do you do when Queens win ?.

You seem to be bizarrely using the fact that because Queens have no wins in nine to defend Chisholm?

Is that it then? His tactics and signings are that terrible that we should expect to lose and be pleased with anything else?

[SpoonTon]

SaltyTON, on Jan 3 2009, 20:53, said:

A deserved point as Queens were gifted two goals by the non-defenders (Walker and Finlayson) not bothering to try and stop them.

Oh, and since I know you'll read this.

Get it right fucking up you, Reidy!

I see it more as Queens being gifted two goals by Irons who set up the defence in a formation in which they were clearly uncomfortable.

[P45]

I must say that I find I slighty amusing that you hate Chisholm so much after wanting McCall to get the boot because he was holding QotS back.

This is not a dig but what do QotS fans expect their team to be regularly achieving?