#1
Gartleahill
Posted 03 November 2007 - 18:30
#4
Ziggy
- Group: Gold Members
- Posts: 1,600
- Joined: 06-November 06
- SA 2010:Chile
- Team:Queen's Park
Posted 03 November 2007 - 18:56
Gartleahill, on Nov 3 2007, 18:30, said:
At the risk of sounding like a sore loser........I thought Airdrie were kak today as well. I think you did sit deep when you went ahead, but it worked. I cant remember us having that many chances. Thought you also tried to waste time alot.
I think we played the better football but it all counts for f**k all if you don't score. We really need a striker.
Who is your big number 6? He looked like a big physical centre half but his touch and distribution is about the worst I've seen this season. Did he just have a bad day or is he always like that?
Ps. how many times did your striker skin the defender just before squaring the ball for the goal?
Looked like a big away support today. Its a shame that they put you at the other end of the stand. Better atmosphere when opposing fans are closer together.
#5
no1diamond
Posted 03 November 2007 - 18:56
#6
an86
Posted 03 November 2007 - 19:57
PS- Hi Watty
This post has been edited by an86: 03 November 2007 - 19:58
#7
thediamonddude
- Group: Gold Members
- Posts: 372
- Joined: 01-October 06
- Location:Airdrie
- Team:Airdrie Utd
Posted 03 November 2007 - 21:02
The tactics at the start seemed simple, get the ball to Noble and Russell and pray they did something between them. We played nice passing football at time but again we had no bite where it really counted. First half saw McDonald go close with a decent drive from outside the box but that was our only real chance of note other than the goal. Good ball through from Waddell (only thing he did all day) and Stuart Noble skinned the defender inside out before putting a good ball across for Russell to tap in.
I actually thought getting that goal would spur us on to kill the game off in the 2nd half, especially after all Kenny's comments about how we can't keep sitting in and defending 1 goal leads. Boy was I wrong.
Second half we were dreadful, we looked fresh out of ideas for most of the half. Had a couple of decent chances with Noble firing wide and K-Mac having another decent effort just go wide but we were in large, utterly gash.
Queens Park had a lot of possession but apart from a good shot that Robbo tipped round the post and a couple of tame efforts straight at him I didn't think they were a big goal threat.
What winds me up is the tactics, don't get me wrong, I'm delighted with the 3 points but any other side who had a prolific striker or goalscorer would have buried us in that second half today. KB takes off our best player, brings on Bryan Prunty and leave him up front himself?
As for some of the individual performances, only 2 were out and out crap for me and that was Paul Lovering and Ricky Waddell, we were completely innefectual down the left hand side today and it was their fault. But does Kenny take them off? No he leaves them on for the full 90 mins.
Anyway, I dunno what to think tonight, we won ugly and I know you have to do that sometimes but we could have made it so much easier on ourselves which is what I don't understand. Considering how we played its 3 points stolen for me but I'll take it as we really need to get out of this league.
On a bright note I thought that Noble, Russell, McDonald and Smyth all had excellent games today. We really have the players but if they ain't given the right tactics then we are gonna suffer this season. Lets be a bit more positive next week against County eh?
This post has been edited by thediamonddude: 03 November 2007 - 21:12
#8
WattyArnott
Posted 03 November 2007 - 21:24
an86, on Nov 3 2007, 19:57, said:
Hi pumpkin
One winfrom 10 games. Shocker. And feck all against the mighty diamonds.
what a pishy wee team of squatters QP are!
King Kong Bundy, on May 19 2007, 23:25, said:
mick1977, on Jun 23 2007, 00:33, said:
Convenor, on Nov 9 2007, 12:55, said:
#9
Spiders For Life
- Group: Gold Members
- Posts: 1,386
- Joined: 21-December 06
- Location:East Kilbride
- Team:Queen's Park
- Gamertag:QPcg
Posted 03 November 2007 - 21:29
an86, on Nov 3 2007, 19:57, said:
PS- Hi Watty
Meh, our passing was good but yet again, we cant finish a thing. McGrady obviously can't cut it and why Stark keeps playing him I have no idea, short of players yes but surely we have something better...Colquhoun? (Sp..)
Airdrie were poor to be honest but all credit to them as they had a chance and they took it.
Stark really has to get someone on loan or something, what we have upfront right now is no where near what we need. Even when Dunn returns I seriously doubt that it will have a massive impact...
I don't really have any criticisms for the defence or midfield, Paton was good as usual and trouten was causing all sorts of problems...yet, as said above, build up play means nothing if you canne finish a thing
#10
WattyArnott
Posted 03 November 2007 - 21:32
Spiders For Life, on Nov 3 2007, 21:29, said:
Airdrie were poor to be honest but all credit to them as they had a chance and they took it.
Stark really has to get someone on loan or something, what we have upfront right now is no where near what we need. Even when Dunn returns I seriously doubt that it will have a massive impact...
I don't really have any criticisms for the defence or midfield, Paton was good as usual and trouten was causing all sorts of problems...yet, as said above, build up play means nothing if you canne finish a thing
King Kong Bundy, on May 19 2007, 23:25, said:
mick1977, on Jun 23 2007, 00:33, said:
Convenor, on Nov 9 2007, 12:55, said:
#11
agd
- Group: Gold Members
- Posts: 68
- Joined: 18-August 06
- Location:Centre of the Universe
- Team:Airdrie Utd
Posted 04 November 2007 - 00:54
#12 Guest_Ron Burgundy_*
- Group: Surfer
Posted 04 November 2007 - 11:54
The full time team were given an absolute lesson in movement and quick passing...all queens were lacking is a decent strikeforce........we were so cumbersome when we had the ball it was dire.
I still have no idea why mcdougal is not getting a game...we have two guys fairly decent in the air and managed about two crosses from the by line all game...one of which was the goal.
There is no balance in the team at all and queens probably deserved something from the game.
Who knows what next time will bring.....???????????
#13
staggy4life
Posted 04 November 2007 - 12:11

#14 Guest_Ron Burgundy_*
- Group: Surfer
Posted 04 November 2007 - 12:53
staggy4life, on Nov 4 2007, 12:11, said:
good it will make it all the sweeter to send you five hours north in the cold and dark after getting your arses spanked.
see you next week
#15
thediamonddude
- Group: Gold Members
- Posts: 372
- Joined: 01-October 06
- Location:Airdrie
- Team:Airdrie Utd
Posted 04 November 2007 - 13:41
staggy4life, on Nov 4 2007, 12:11, said:
Don't get me wrong I believe we are more than capable of beating you lot next week, especially since we are at home and haven't lost there since the opening day. However, if we play like we did on Saturday we could be on the recieving end of a right pumping next week. I think we'll be seeing a very different Airdrie side though as KB will be desperate to prove a lot of people wrong next week.
As for McDougall Ron, he was still injured yesterday. They gave him a late fitness test but he just wasn't ready to come back. I agree though, when he's fit the guy really needs a start. Waddell shouldn't have stayed on the park for so long yesterday, it really should have been Homer on the left.
Next week, assuming everyone's fit, my midfield would be Holmes on the left, McDougall on the right with McKeown and McDonald in the middle.
#16 Guest_Ron Burgundy_*
- Group: Surfer
Posted 04 November 2007 - 14:37
thediamonddude,
on Nov 4 2007, 13:41, said:
As for McDougall Ron, he was still injured yesterday. They gave him a late fitness test but he just wasn't ready to come back. I agree though, when he's fit the guy really needs a start. Waddell shouldn't have stayed on the park for so long yesterday, it really should have been Homer on the left.
Next week, assuming everyone's fit, my midfield would be Holmes on the left, McDougall on the right with McKeown and McDonald in the middle.
it is bemusing when black continually playes folk out of position ... especially when the guy filling the berth is gash.....I thought macdonald was far better sitting in front of the back 4...and on a number of occasions he was the only midfielder getting beyong the strikers...he was not anywhere near as bad as the majority of the support maqde out...he's getting the blame for the team playing poorly.
Being injured a pretty good reason for not playing him ... did you see how raging russell was when he got pulled back!
#17
wearealldoomed
- Group: Gold Members
- Posts: 4,151
- Joined: 22-August 04
- Location:Mount Florida
- Team:Airdrie Utd
Posted 04 November 2007 - 17:15
A win's a win, but the abuse levelled at Black after the final whist'e tells it's own story.
In the first half, I thought we were the better team, however in keeping with the last couple of seasons' play, we seemed to want to walk the ball into the net. The second half was an utter scandal though.
It appeared to me that we were instructed to sit deep and close the game out, but all that resulted from this was nearly constant Queen's pressure. For all that, Queen's pre-occupation with playing pretty patterns in a similar manner to Airdrie limited them to a couple of clear cut chances. Fortunately, Robertson was up to the job.
The most worrying aspect of that pish for me was the lack of dig. Many times, we hat decent opportunities to break yet slowed the game down to snail's pace with square passes, allowing Queen's to gat players behind the ball. If there was a bit more agression and directness about our play, our strikers could tear most defences in ths league to pieces.
Get Black to feck now, and send Lovering and MacDonald with him.
How come one man got so much fame?
#18
Andyboy
- Group: Gold Members
- Posts: 2,013
- Joined: 17-May 04
- Location:Glasgow
- SA 2010:Korea DPR
- Team:Queen's Park
- Gamertag:Andyboy1867
Posted 04 November 2007 - 18:47
The goal we lost was shambolic as well, the Airdrie winger skinned Agostini inside and out and the guy in the middle had all the space in the world to hammer the ball past Cairnsy. Stark brought on Big Paul Ronald at half time and instead of sticking him up front to partner Stevie, he puts him in defensive midfield, a bizzare decision in my book. I can only remember one real chance for us, and it was a great save from the keeper to stop Canning from netting near the end.
We desperately need a proper striker. We don't have a real goalscorer in the team.
#19
++Ammo - Airdrie++
- Group: Gold Members
- Posts: 556
- Joined: 13-March 07
- Location:Airdrie
- Team:Airdrie Utd
- Gamertag:ammoairdrie
Posted 04 November 2007 - 18:53
wearealldoomed,
on Nov 4 2007, 18:15, said:
A win's a win, but the abuse levelled at Black after the final whist'e tells it's own story.
In the first half, I thought we were the better team, however in keeping with the last couple of seasons' play, we seemed to want to walk the ball into the net. The second half was an utter scandal though.
It appeared to me that we were instructed to sit deep and close the game out, but all that resulted from this was nearly constant Queen's pressure. For all that, Queen's pre-occupation with playing pretty patterns in a similar manner to Airdrie limited them to a couple of clear cut chances. Fortunately, Robertson was up to the job.
The most worrying aspect of that pish for me was the lack of dig. Many times, we hat decent opportunities to break yet slowed the game down to snail's pace with square passes, allowing Queen's to gat players behind the ball. If there was a bit more agression and directness about our play, our strikers could tear most defences in ths league to pieces.
Get Black to feck now, and send Lovering and MacDonald with him.
cannot agree more mate, that was honestly the worst 45 minutes of footbll I have ever seen in my Life, i would really like to know how many shots on goal airdrie had I think it was 4, McDonald had 2 and noble and russell 1 each......1 was on target and it was the goal......from 10 mins into it Lovering looked injured and played like he had 1 leg that was the single worst performance from a player I have seen all season. McDonald wasn't AS bad yesterday as he has been for the past 9 games (not counting or anything) and he just isn't up to the job. The manager is saying in the sunday papers that he DID NOT instruct the team to defend.......so did Allan Russell come back to midfield of his own free will???? Don't think so, Black deserved the abuse as he is tactically inept and basically hasn't got a clue. I can't believe im writing this but if its gonna take a humping off someone to get him to go then lets get it over with!!
#20
an86
Posted 04 November 2007 - 19:04
#21
Diamonds are Forever
Posted 04 November 2007 - 19:46
an86, on Nov 4 2007, 19:04, said:
Do you not think by reading every post by the Airdrie fans on here that they agree ?? That is why we are angry. We have the best squad of players in this league IMO. No better shot stopper than Robbo (he's crap at crosses though I'll give you that). No better defense, as the goals against record says and certainly no better strikers than Noble and Russell, with Prunty as back up. Our midfield is the only real area for concern. Although that's more down to Kenny Black's tactics IMO. If we had a decent manager we would win this league, and that's why we are annoyed, because we know we should be doing better.
#22
an86
Posted 04 November 2007 - 21:07
Diamonds are Forever, on Nov 4 2007, 19:46, said:
My point is that nearly every other team in the league would be more than happy with an away win no matter what the performance. However fans of your team seem to think it is your devine right to turn up and turn over part time teams comfartably. Booing your team off after a victory is a joke. Black will go eventually this season but when Dick Campbell or whoever else is installed it will be no different, Airdrie simply aren't good enough to go up and the fans should take a reality check.
#23
Gartleahill
Posted 04 November 2007 - 21:52
#24
Raith_Raver
- Group: Gold Members
- Posts: 393
- Joined: 05-October 07
- Location:Dysart Bred
- Team:Scotland
Posted 04 November 2007 - 22:03
Gartleahill, on Nov 4 2007, 21:52, said:
Airdrie United have much less pedigree than Queen's Park, who (apart from their early history) have also played in the 1st division not so long ago. You seem to be identifying your team with Airdrieonians. I'm not saying this is right or wrong, but technically they arent and therefore until they actually achieve something in their own name you've no right to be claiming you should be this or that.
Edit - I accept taht being a full-time club expects to be above the second division, but that is something different.
This post has been edited by Raith_Raver: 04 November 2007 - 22:05
#25
an86
Posted 04 November 2007 - 22:11
Gartleahill, on Nov 4 2007, 21:52, said:
Airdrie United have found there level. A team with a core support of 850 fans doesn't deserve to be in a higher division. The difference is that Queens, Stenny and Albion Rovers fans know that there team has a certain level. Being such a young club the fans shouldn't expect the team to walk before they can run.
Sign In
Register
Help



Back to top
MultiQuote














