Return to forums
Register new account
Login:

The Pie Shop: Queens 2 Stirling 2 - The Pie Shop

Jump to content


  • (2 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Queens 2 Stirling 2 Rate Topic: -----

#26
Guest_potter1919_*

  • Group: Surfer

View PostSkyline Drifter, on Sep 29 2007, 21:07, said:

Definitely two points dropped for me though it seems as usual I was at a different game from most. :rolleyes:

Thought we started very well and were passing through Stirling very easily in the first quarter hour without ever looking like finding the killer ball or forcing a save out of Hogarth to be fair. Somewhere in there the ref turned down one of the most obvious penalties I've ever seen when the defender took Tosh's legs away in the box when he burst forward. It was SO obvious a penalty that I was already celebrating it when I realised we were still playing. :blink: I can't believe he didn't give it.

Needless to say Stirling got out of their half for the first time in 17 minutes, Paton was too deep and played Easton on, McGowan didn't get there, Paton slipped trying to cover, the boy hit it striaght at MacDonald but somehow the ball deflected off the keeper and into the net. A ridiculous goal to lose.

To be fair after that I thought Stirling, whilst understandably hardly pushing forward (why should they?), always looked dangerous on the break and we never looked much like equalising in the first half.

Second half and Bingham (I think) poked Sean through past the offside trap to equalise though the finish was fortunate in that Hogarth dived over it and it went through the covering defender's legs I think. From then on we dominated and should have scored at least once with an O'Connor header (thought we had a lot of success with high balls today, even Scally was continually winning headers in the box) before Dobbie came on. Our second was a thing of beauty, Dobbie took it out of the sky, nutmegged his man and then curled it round Hogarth and in off the post. Superb goal.

We had the odd chance to finish it as a contest but as the last ten ticked on we started to drop far too deep and when McGowan made a pig's ear of a clearance we were sunk though it was still a fine finish from McBride from outside the box I think.

Thought we played quite well at times but there were a few passengers. We really really missed Lauchlan at the back, McGowan sorry to say had a nightmare. I thought Bingham was poor again though he did improve when we got him playing behind the front two after Dobbie came on rather than up top. He's never a forward for me but creating behind he can do a job for us. Gilmour again looks decent on the ball but I'm still waiting for any dangerous product after two months.

YAWN
0

#27
User is offline   RedWeb 

  • International Call Up
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 3,874
  • Joined: 20-November 03
  • Location:Eilean Nan Ron
  • Team:Stirling Albion
On a separate issue do QOS have plans to move to a new ground or redevelop Palmerston any time soon ? By going full time I assume the QOS directors have ambitions to get into the SPL so an expensive upgrade to Palmerston or a new home would be needed...any plans on ice :huh:
0

#28
User is offline   kirkyblue2 

  • First Division Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 2,334
  • Joined: 05-September 04
  • Location:Planet Zanussi
  • Team:Queen of the South

View PostRedWeb, on Sep 30 2007, 15:45, said:

On a separate issue do QOS have plans to move to a new ground or redevelop Palmerston any time soon ? By going full time I assume the QOS directors have ambitions to get into the SPL so an expensive upgrade to Palmerston or a new home would be needed...any plans on ice :huh:

Plans were drawn up to redevelop Palmerston but lack of funding means they're on ice.
Don't really know what ambitions the board has for Queens but McCall left as he stated they weren't ambitious enough for him but I suppose you could take that with a huge pinch of salt.
It's not easy being grumpy
0

#29
User is offline   FC_1919 

  • Hug It Out...
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 9,707
  • Joined: 06-March 04
  • Location:Dumfries
  • Team:Queen of the South
What a load of gash in the first half, when is the Chis going to realise that Scally and McFarlane cant play in the same team. Scally is not in anyway shape or form a left sided player.

Improved in the second half, Dobbie looked better than he has been in the last few weeks when he came on.

Paul Burns must be very upset in having been dropped from the squad for Scott Robertson.
Queen of the South Football Club <3
0

#30
User is offline   Distant Doonhamer 

  • First Division Signing Target
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,754
  • Joined: 13-November 05
  • Team:Queen of the South

View Postpotter1919, on Sep 30 2007, 15:40, said:

YAWN

YAWN
0

#31
User is offline   MIFTHEBINO 

  • First Division Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 2,184
  • Joined: 06-July 03
  • Location:Stirling
  • Team:Stirling Albion

View Postkirkyblue2, on Sep 30 2007, 15:54, said:

Plans were drawn up to redevelop Palmerston but lack of funding means they're on ice.
Don't really know what ambitions the board has for Queens but McCall left as he stated they weren't ambitious enough for him but I suppose you could take that with a huge pinch of salt.



Keep it as it is!!! :angry: :angry:

I love your stadium and it's definetly my favourite in the SFL.

You have a mix of everything with it- lovely old main stand, fantastic terracing and cow shed behind the goal and a shiney new stand down the other side.

This is what all football stadiums should be like. :(
Giving Alloa a 12 point lead and pipping them to the title on the last day of the season- PRICELESS!!
0

#32
User is offline   RedWeb 

  • International Call Up
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 3,874
  • Joined: 20-November 03
  • Location:Eilean Nan Ron
  • Team:Stirling Albion
RedWeb's pics from the game are now on-line for anyone who is interested B)
0

#33
User is offline   veteran 

  • Third Division Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,314
  • Joined: 26-July 05
  • Team:Queen of the South

View PostDistant Doonhamer, on Sep 30 2007, 19:59, said:

YAWN

Potters inability to read more than two short sentences seems to be spreading.
0

#34
User is offline   Flash 

  • First Division Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 2,026
  • Joined: 01-October 05
  • Team:Queen of the South
Bit late with this, I know.
Only point I want to make is that if McBride's goal had been a "bolt from the blue" it would have been bad enough, but the same player was in the same position (ie moving forward from the centre of the pitch to a position where he could shoot/play a killer pass) four or five times after we scored. Now, given that we have TWO defensive midfield players, did one of them not think (after the first time) that it might be a good idea to close him down? If we assume that they didn't think this, is it not the manager's job to get a message on to the pitch to make sure this happens? Or, did he get the message across but the player(s) in question were too knackered to do anything about it? I thought Stirling looked fitter and quicker than us all game. Maybe we should go back to training two nights a week.
We possibly didn't deserve a win (first half we were terrible, second half a bit better) but that is no reason to give a goal away so easily near the end.
On a more general note, the two worst teams I've seen this season are Livingston and us (against Clyde and first half on Saturday). And Livingston seem to be improving.....

This post has been edited by Flash: 01 October 2007 - 12:29

0

#35
User is offline   RedWeb 

  • International Call Up
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 3,874
  • Joined: 20-November 03
  • Location:Eilean Nan Ron
  • Team:Stirling Albion

View PostFlash, on Oct 1 2007, 13:28, said:

Now, given that we have TWO defensive midfield players, did one of them not think (after the first time) that it might be a good idea to close him down? If we assume that they didn't think this, is it not the manager's job to get a message on to the pitch to make sure this happens? Or, did he get the message across but the player(s) in question were too knackered to do anything about it?

As I said in an earlier post I thought McFarlane was finished after 75 minutes and McBride, Bell and Aitken were simply walking past him. Basically the Queens central midfield went awol and they were asking to be punished.
0

#36
User is offline   veteran 

  • Third Division Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,314
  • Joined: 26-July 05
  • Team:Queen of the South

View PostRedWeb, on Oct 1 2007, 13:49, said:

As I said in an earlier post I thought McFarlane was finished after 75 minutes and McBride, Bell and Aitken were simply walking past him. Basically the Queens central midfield went awol and they were asking to be punished.

Now there's an idea.
If McFarlane did go awol , Chisholm might be able to decide what to do in mid-field and we might get a settled team with some semblance of shape.
Too good to be true.
0

#37
User is offline   Palmerston_1919 

  • Junior League Starter
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 305
  • Joined: 26-November 05
  • Team:Queen of the South

View Postveteran, on Oct 1 2007, 17:21, said:

If McFarlane did go awol , Chisholm might be able to decide what to do in mid-field and we might get a settled team with some semblance of shape.


....Don't put money on it, McFarlane might have the acceleration of a slug and the fitness of a sumo wrestler, but it appears he can do no wrong in Chsiholms eyes.

This post has been edited by Palmerston_1919: 01 October 2007 - 17:29

0

#38
User is offline   Flash 

  • First Division Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 2,026
  • Joined: 01-October 05
  • Team:Queen of the South

View PostPalmerston_1919, on Oct 1 2007, 18:29, said:

....Don't put money on it, McFarlane might have the acceleration of a slug and the fitness of a sumo wrestler, but it appears he can do no wrong in Chsiholms eyes.

It does seem strange that some players get in the team no matter what they do to justify it or otherwise. While some others are the first to be taken off and/or the first to be dropped.
I can't work this out. Maybe if you go to the Board and ask them to dig deep to fund a player's (or players') wages, you'd look a bit of a fool if you left them out only a few weeks in to the season.
But it can't be that.
You end up inventing all sorts of conspiracy theories because you just can't understand it. I just put it down to Chisholm having the most excellent judgement and seeing something in a player that I can't. After all, he's the professional with an excellent track record in management. Brannigan, too, looks like an intelligent sort of bloke, so his input will be invaluable as well.
Between them, they clearly see contributions being made all over the park that the fans don't appreciate and they employ tactics that only a professional would understand. They also seem to have a training regime that is built for the longer term as they don't want to tire the players out too early in the season. I mean, 67 year old Thomson missed virtually the whole pre-season, yet he stepped back into the team and looked no less fit than the rest of them.
It is a pity that a lot of fans seem to have already given up going to the matches just because they don't have the wit or imagination to understand Chisholm's approach.
0

#39
User is offline   veteran 

  • Third Division Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,314
  • Joined: 26-July 05
  • Team:Queen of the South

View PostFlash, on Oct 1 2007, 21:53, said:

It does seem strange that some players get in the team no matter what they do to justify it or otherwise. While some others are the first to be taken off and/or the first to be dropped.
I can't work this out. Maybe if you go to the Board and ask them to dig deep to fund a player's (or players') wages, you'd look a bit of a fool if you left them out only a few weeks in to the season.
But it can't be that.
You end up inventing all sorts of conspiracy theories because you just can't understand it. I just put it down to Chisholm having the most excellent judgement and seeing something in a player that I can't. After all, he's the professional with an excellent track record in management. Brannigan, too, looks like an intelligent sort of bloke, so his input will be invaluable as well.
Between them, they clearly see contributions being made all over the park that the fans don't appreciate and they employ tactics that only a professional would understand. They also seem to have a training regime that is built for the longer term as they don't want to tire the players out too early in the season. I mean, 67 year old Thomson missed virtually the whole pre-season, yet he stepped back into the team and looked no less fit than the rest of them.
It is a pity that a lot of fans seem to have already given up going to the matches just because they don't have the wit or imagination to understand Chisholm's approach.

It would be interesting to get the take of some Dundee Utd fans on Chisholm.
Did he have 'favourites' at Tannadice and did this do the team any good.
He certainly has favourites at Palmerston and in some cases I'm at a loss to see why.
0

#40
User is offline   Mak QOSFC 

  • First Division Superstar
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 2,643
  • Joined: 05-August 07
  • Location:Wonderful Dumfries
  • Team:Queen of the South
I don't like the way this threads going. MacFarlane is a top notch football player and a great man in general. We are lucky to have him.
0

#41
User is offline   Palmerston_1919 

  • Junior League Starter
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 305
  • Joined: 26-November 05
  • Team:Queen of the South

View PostMak QOSFC, on Oct 1 2007, 22:32, said:

I don't like the way this threads going. MacFarlane is a top notch football player and a great man in general. We are lucky to have him.


Neil, stop mucking about on the internet and get yerself down the gym!
0

#42
User is offline   hotrodqos 

  • Junior League Sub
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 218
  • Joined: 21-April 04
  • Team:Queen of the South
[quote name='Flash' date='Oct 1 2007, 21:53' post='1880166']
They also seem to have a training regime that is built for the longer term




Yes stephen swift reveals in yesterdays sun that whoever lost at volleys had to take in cakes to training. :D :D
0

Share this topic:


  • (2 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users