[Clyde4life]

strathbrock, on Sep 30 2007, 17:29, said:

Now if there was no name on that report how would I just know it was done by a Clyde fan.
"Livi are arguably the best side we have played this season. And Livi could have netted 6 or 7 but there was not much between the sides." - eh?? Sorry mate but Clyde were the worst side I've seen this season, including Livi at Firhill where we were abysmal.

Yet we managed to compete quite comfortably when it was 11 vs 11, what does that say about how good you're team are?

The simple truth is that 11 vs 11, it was even, then the ref ruined the spectacle. Pesir and Craig were excellent up front and caused us problems, that our defensive performance may have yielded to eventually.

[Charles Darwin Esq]

[Mushroom]

Demon Drawer, on Oct 1 2007, 14:28, said:

It was only 11 v 10 for 10 minutes and all we scored in that time was the penalty whcih was the result of you red card. When it became 10 v 10 we scored twice to your once. So actually when there were 11 v 11 on the park it was 2-1 as the sending off could not have affected the scoring of the penalty. Then with 10 v 10 it was also 2-1 so we dominated the game at all times when it was level in players on the park.

It was enough to give you the momentum, which we couldn't stop even when Snodgrass walked.

edit, DD pointed out mistake, always get them two mixed up for some reason

This post has been edited by ochil-clyde: 02 October 2007 - 14:32