Broomhill Ultra Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Just wondering if there would be any kind of mileage in a new club being set up with the name of Rangers (AFC or whatever) that specifically rejected all the sectarian and right wing nonsense that is attached to RFC? Despite the winding up on here we all know good guys at work, in your family etc that support them and who don't have any interest in the crap associated with the OF in general and Rangers in particular. Could easily be enough interest to get a lowland league, fan owned club started? Rangers without the cringe that so many of them must feel. A Rangers with a sense of humour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 If they didn't do it four years ago, they never will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richie Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 They could then arrange to buy the old club's history from the other company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 You could have a 3rd Rangers for people who thought the old one jumped the shark when it signed Mo Johnstone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Just wondering if there would be any kind of mileage in a new club being set up with the name of Rangers (AFC or whatever) that specifically rejected all the sectarian and right wing nonsense that is attached to RFC? Despite the winding up on here we all know good guys at work, in your family etc that support them and who don't have any interest in the crap associated with the OF in general and Rangers in particular. Could easily be enough interest to get a lowland league, fan owned club started? Rangers without the cringe that so many of them must feel. A Rangers with a sense of humour. " Good Guys at work " support a despicable vile sectarian Football Club and do f**k all to stop a " scum minority " disgracing Scottish Football, Scotland & Britain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaffenThinMint Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Just wondering if there would be any kind of mileage in a new club being set up with the name of Rangers (AFC or whatever) that specifically rejected all the sectarian and right wing nonsense that is attached to RFC? Despite the winding up on here we all know good guys at work, in your family etc that support them and who don't have any interest in the crap associated with the OF in general and Rangers in particular. Could easily be enough interest to get a lowland league, fan owned club started? Rangers without the cringe that so many of them must feel. A Rangers with a sense of humour. There's been enough attempts to turn dozens of Scottish football clubs into Diet Rangers at one point or another (Airdrie, Clyde, Dundee, Hearts, Irvine Meadow, etc) without anyone bothering to set up another one. A Rangers without the bigotry and "we are the master race" trappings will be about as popular as Rabies flavour Pedigree Chum at Crufts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broomhill Ultra Posted May 25, 2016 Author Share Posted May 25, 2016 " Good Guys at work " support a despicable vile sectarian Football Club and do f**k all to stop a " scum minority " disgracing Scottish Football, Scotland & Britain. Will I put you down as a 'maybe'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Will I put you down as a 'maybe'? Mibbes aye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 We already have enough, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersRyan084 Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 Mibbes aye Mibbies naw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.