MJC Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 If I remember rightly, after the goal did they not literally play about 7 at the back? And I mean literally in the real sense...not the Jamie Redknapp version. Sounds about right and as usual, we had no answer whatsoever to a team defending in numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Here's the BBC report of the game: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/scot_div_1/3532159.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mantis Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 If I remember rightly, after the goal did they not literally play about 7 at the back? And I mean literally in the real sense...not the Jamie Redknapp version. You'd better hope it's ICT then or you'll be up against Albion with 9 at the back : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al B Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 You'd better hope it's ICT then or you'll be up against Albion with 9 at the back : If it's The Binos, Agent Corrigan will see us alright Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Binos123sam Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 You'd better hope it's ICT then or you'll be up against Albion with 9 at the back : Hardly it's just we played better than you's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeSAFC Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 You'd better hope it's ICT then or you'll be up against Albion with 9 at the back : Im sure they will be hoping its ICT as you also don't offer much up front Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Vaughn Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 You'd better hope it's ICT then or you'll be up against Albion with 9 at the back :Funnily enough, Stirling played two up front yet Inverness played one up front. Hmmm, something no right with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Malkmus Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 Im sure they will be hoping its ICT as you also don't offer much up front Funnily enough, Stirling played two up front yet Inverness played one up front. Hmmm, something no right with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Binos123sam Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 Funnily enough, Stirling played two up front yet Inverness played one up front. Hmmm, something no right with that.Are you bringing your guitar to the game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ropy Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 If I remember rightly, after the goal did they not literally play about 7 at the back? And I mean literally in the real sense...not the Jamie Redknapp version. I remember it as a flat back 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mantis Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 Funnily enough, Stirling played two up front yet Inverness played one up front. Hmmm, something no right with that. Im sure they will be hoping its ICT as you also don't offer much up front Hardly it's just we played better than you's Here, fishy fishy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJC Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 Our postponed match with Partick Th has now been rearranged for Tuesday 2nd February, the midweek before this tie. Hopefully that doesn't impact on our chances too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Vaughn Posted January 13, 2016 Share Posted January 13, 2016 Are you bringing your guitar to the game?Aye, both the Inverness and the Motherwell games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crilly Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Our postponed match with Partick Th has now been rearranged for Tuesday 2nd February, the midweek before this tie. Hopefully that doesn't impact on our chances too much. Yes, far from ideal. Why did the club agree to this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted January 19, 2016 Author Share Posted January 19, 2016 So Inverness progress as expected. Should be a good cup tie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Mutumbo to put Motherwell to the sword. All aboard the Mutumbo party bus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeSAFC Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Motherwell should pump them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mantis Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Motherwell should pump them Run along now Jake, nothing to see here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTPAISLEY Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 I still have nightmares about Barry Wilson lobbing Gordon Marshall from about 40 yards the last time we played Inverness at Fir Park in the cup. Tricky tie but one we're capable of winning, though I'm sure Inverness are thinking the exact same thing. It was 70 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeSAFC Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Run along now Jake, nothing to see here Enjoy your pumping Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.