Bul21402 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 I felt yesterday that both teams were dismaying the same attitude at different times during the game yesterday Cumnock played well in 1st half without having a really dangerous goal threat, but, moving the ball about well and Bankies clearing the lines in a kind of rushed panicky way Cumnock lose a goal and looked like the 1st half Bankies, being disjointed and 2nd to a lot of the play. Bankies looked as if they could go on and score a 3rd goal, but, then lost a goal, arguably against the run of play, and then started to look like rabbits caught in the headlights and could ( and possibly should) have lost the game at the death when the late penalty claim was turned down. Although it looked as if the goalie got to the ball in the penalty incident, as the ball went out to the side, it also looked as if he took out the player with his follow through , which is, anywhere else on the park, a foul. all the best to Bankies and it's noticeable there is still a reasonable crowd backing the team, but, hope you finish below us, purely for selfish reasons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essdee Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Match photos are HERE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forrest Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Excellent quality of highlights RTB, however, i was looking forward to having anbetter look at the goal we got chopped off. I thought it was offside, but hellish tight. Thout your video could have put my mind at rest. Then the late, late penalty claim. It would have been great to see that, as i was at the opposite end of the park by then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANKIEBILL Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 What's happened to Voyager ? Surely he would've shown the right highlights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poolwizard Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 What's happened to Voyager ? Surely he would've shown the right highlights He wasn't at the game yesterday but normally if theres someone else doing video stuff he will leave it to them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forrest Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 RTB may just hav missed the incidents. He has in the past, shown that type of thing. That's the only reason I asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bankies Alive Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 The one at the end was never a pen.Keeper got to the ball 1st and touched it out for a throw.Cumnock forward fell over him after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RtB1998 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Here's the penalty shout at the end of the game for those who are interested https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N3KOLScZY0&feature=youtu.be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Looks like the keeper got a decent hand to the ball! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forrest Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Cheers RTB, looks like a pen to me. Also well done for standing up that scaffold, as it was Baltic doon by the wall, had to be worse up there...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bul21402 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Got to agree with Forrest , think the keeper got Robert Love's left foot as he tried to clear the ball and Defo took him out. However, it's immaterial now as it wasn't given , but, I'm sure if it had been at other end the Bankies fans would have been looking for the pen as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC1987 Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 I'm freezing just listening to that wind again. Debatable with the 2nd penalty incident whether Love or the keeper touches it first. For me it's Love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PtB Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 Great touch from the keeper, never a penalty in a million years. Apart from a few shouts from the crowd there is no real appeal for a penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philyerboots Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 For sure a stonewall penalty . Keeper makes sure the player is taken out . Week ref, not giving that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passbackdave Posted March 2, 2015 Author Share Posted March 2, 2015 The guy love is never in control of the ball not once does he touch the ball and Hamilton touches the ball and then takes love out. Never a pen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bul21402 Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 The guy love is never in control of the ball not once does he touch the ball and Hamilton touches the ball and then takes love out. Never a penDon't agree that Love never had control , he touched the ball just a fraction before the keeper got his hand on it and looked like he pushed the ball away to side of Love's footHowever, by your own definition, Hamilton then took him out. If the momentum of a challenge anywhere else on the field that subsequently takes a player out is a foul in the modern day game, why should a goalie be any different Not saying I agree with the rules but if a Ayer is taken out, in the box by a tackle whether the opponent wins the ball or not, it should be a foul. However, we know that refs are going to bottle out of giving a pen in that situation where it would almost certainly decide the game I still believe that the result of the game was about right over the piece , so probably justice was done at the end of the day, but, was still a pen ( heeHee) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 If the ball went in the same direction I would have said pen but it clearly went In The direction the keeper was going ie the side so no pen for me LADESIDE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passbackdave Posted March 2, 2015 Author Share Posted March 2, 2015 If the ball went in the same direction I would have said pen but it clearly went In The direction the keeper was going ie the side so no pen for me LADESIDE correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passbackdave Posted March 2, 2015 Author Share Posted March 2, 2015 Don't agree that Love never had control , he touched the ball just a fraction before the keeper got his hand on it and looked like he pushed the ball away to side of Love's foot However, by your own definition, Hamilton then took him out. If the momentum of a challenge anywhere else on the field that subsequently takes a player out is a foul in the modern day game, why should a goalie be any different Not saying I agree with the rules but if a Ayer is taken out, in the box by a tackle whether the opponent wins the ball or not, it should be a foul. However, we know that refs are going to bottle out of giving a pen in that situation where it would almost certainly decide the game I still believe that the result of the game was about right over the piece , so probably justice was done at the end of the day, but, was still a pen ( heeHee) if he touches it by a fraction that's hardly in control of the ball. I agree our keeper takes ur player out but that's after he's played the ball and it was a compete clean tackle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldaniti Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 I don't even remember there being a claim at the time, I was struggling to think what penalty claim people were talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.