spud2 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 I see the linlithgow goalie got off with his sending off last week as the ref made an error when writing the report. It would be interesting to find out if linlithgow had actually appealed the sending off.If they had done all I can say is the league is blatantly guilty of favoring the so called bigger teams. This was proved by the scandalous decision to give Ross Donnelly of fauldhouse a 5 game suspension for appealing his red card against musselburgh. I would like to know what the disciplinary committee actually do when an appeal is submitted. Do they speak to anybody else apart from the ref that was at the game? If they did they would see the ref is a liar. He said the burgh player involved needed treatment which didn't happen. Also the same player was bragging on Facebook that you need to do whatever it takes to win a game. This to me admits he cheated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glensmad Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 I see the linlithgow goalie got off with his sending off last week as the ref made an error when writing the report. It would be interesting to find out if linlithgow had actually appealed the sending off.If they had done all I can say is the league is blatantly guilty of favoring the so called bigger teams. This was proved by the scandalous decision to give Ross Donnelly of fauldhouse a 5 game suspension for appealing his red card against musselburgh. I would like to know what the disciplinary committee actually do when an appeal is submitted. Do they speak to anybody else apart from the ref that was at the game? If they did they would see the ref is a liar. He said the burgh player involved needed treatment which didn't happen. Also the same player was bragging on Facebook that you need to do whatever it takes to win a game. This to me admits he cheated. I heard that the referee's mistake was to put the wrong player number down for the offence. If that is the case, then Linlithgow would be perfectly correct to appeal that report, as the wrong player would be getting punished. It's up to the referee to make sure his report at the end of a game correctly reflects the events of what happened on the pitch and the decisions he made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow card Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 I see the linlithgow goalie got off with his sending off last week as the ref made an error when writing the report. It would be interesting to find out if linlithgow had actually appealed the sending off.If they had done all I can say is the league is blatantly guilty of favoring the so called bigger teams. This was proved by the scandalous decision to give Ross Donnelly of fauldhouse a 5 game suspension for appealing his red card against musselburgh. I would like to know what the disciplinary committee actually do when an appeal is submitted. Do they speak to anybody else apart from the ref that was at the game? If they did they would see the ref is a liar. He said the burgh player involved needed treatment which didn't happen. Also the same player was bragging on Facebook that you need to do whatever it takes to win a game. This to me admits he cheated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow card Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 They might have looked at the next fixtures and based there decision on that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spud2 Posted December 15, 2014 Author Share Posted December 15, 2014 If thats the case why was nothing done when penicuick filled in both teamsheets wrongly against fauldhouse earlier in the season. Fauldhouse were told it was an error and had no grounds to appeal. Penicuick had a guy playing number 5 who wasn't marked on either teamsheet.what's the difference between a club secretary and a ref making a mistake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drs Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 The West put their discipline/appeals on the website and its amazing, if I'm reading it right, how many guys get off with it because the ref has put down the wrong number or name. Maybe literacy and numeracy lessons for Xmas for referees. e2a - http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/sjfa/football_document_libraries.cfm?page=3819 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shuggie123 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Nothing new Linlithgow winning something on a technicality. They've been using loopholes for as long as I can remember and even won a league title on a technicality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tracy Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Have to agree 5 match ban for a player that has not got a bad record and gets fouled the most in every game. Numpty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasy23 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 The West put their discipline/appeals on the website and its amazing, if I'm reading it right, how many guys get off with it because the ref has put down the wrong number or name. Maybe literacy and numeracy lessons for Xmas for referees. e2a - http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/sjfa/football_document_libraries.cfm?page=3819 The ref in the Darvel v Dalry game must have had a bad day at the office! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Nothing new Linlithgow winning something on a technicality. They've been using loopholes for as long as I can remember and even won a league title on a technicality. ^^^^ seething ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuzzyBear Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Spud and Shuggie are a pair of roasters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTG Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Nothing new Linlithgow winning something on a technicality. They've been using loopholes for as long as I can remember and even won a league title on a technicality. We have been known to lose one on a technicality. I think it's important to understand that you're talking utter shite. Carry on now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmontheloknow Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 The ref in the Darvel v Dalry game must have had a bad day at the office! He'll be getting requests from some clubs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheep77 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Nothing new Linlithgow winning something on a technicality. They've been using loopholes for as long as I can remember and even won a league title on a technicality. What was the technicality that the rose won the league on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJ1210 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 The ref in the Darvel v Dalry game must have had a bad day at the office! A bit ironic that the SJFA can't even get the referees name correct though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Northerner Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 A bit ironic that the SJFA can't even get the referees name correct though Would that be the West Region rather than the SJFA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spud2 Posted December 15, 2014 Author Share Posted December 15, 2014 So I'm a roaster because I've pointed out something that everyone involved in junior football in the east already knew. If your a so called big team the league will do everything to help you but if your a smaller club your treated as dirt and this was proved by the treatment of Ross donnelly. A 5 game ban for a tackle is a joke and this was the leagues way of basically saying the smaller sides needn't waste their time. You would have thought they would be trying to help the regions teams in the Scottish cup not make sure he's suspended for the next round in January. Would never happen to a "big team" player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 So I'm a roaster because I've pointed out something that everyone involved in junior football in the east already knew. If your a so called big team the league will do everything to help you but if your a smaller club your treated as dirt and this was proved by the treatment of Ross donnelly. A 5 game ban for a tackle is a joke and this was the leagues way of basically saying the smaller sides needn't waste their time. You would have thought they would be trying to help the regions teams in the Scottish cup not make sure he's suspended for the next round in January. Would never happen to a "big team" player. dont think the five game ban was for a tackle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 the rose had video evidence when gordon herd got wrongly sent off in the big scottish.the club chose not to defend the red card because it costs £s and a case is very rarely turned around even although the video proved gordon to be wrongly sent off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmontheloknow Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 As far as I know any appeal the region views as wasting their time (i.e. frivilous) will result in a lengthened ban. Unless the ref turns round to say 'I was wrong, it wasn't such and such' then it stands, and the ban will be extended. I don't disagree with that as there has to be something in place to stop clubs appealing any red card on the off-chance it's overturned. Unless video evidence is highly supportive (for example, showing mistaken identity) it would appear to be a high risk strategy to appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.