Crùbag Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Shocking that this isn't getting more attention. Carpet. Swept. Under. ? http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5413/mp-paedophiles-were-untouchables-ex-special-branch-officer#.VHEB-1pDFB4.twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crùbag Posted November 23, 2014 Author Share Posted November 23, 2014 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/will-black/child-abuse-wanless-review_b_6143070.html?utm_hp_ref=tw From the Huff Post: Abuse Campaigners Are Not Conspiracy Theorists, Mr Cameron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClydeNewcomer Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Shocking that this isn't getting more attention. Carpet. Swept. Under. ? http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5413/mp-paedophiles-were-untouchables-ex-special-branch-officer#.VHEB-1pDFB4.twitter And all the so called conspiracy theorist tin foil hat nujobs have been saying that for decades. Thousands and thousands here and in the united states have came out against it. Most of the cases not investigated or covered up because of the powerful p***ks involved in it. All this is the tip of a massive iceberg that people have been saying for literally decades and laughed away. The amount of children and now adults that come out of these paedophile rings is absolutely astonishing. This is the world we live in people and enough with the tin foil hat shite. it is played out This is the shit the public should be demonstrating against in mass protests all over the country. Instead we have controlled debates where politiicans and moron members of the public babble on about bicycle paths and smaller class sizes. As george carlin says 'The game is rigged folks' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClydeNewcomer Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Shocking that this isn't getting more attention. Carpet. Swept. Under. ? http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5413/mp-paedophiles-were-untouchables-ex-special-branch-officer#.VHEB-1pDFB4.twitter You can bet anything you want tomorrows headlines will be kim kardashians arse or more hatemongering propaganda about how we should be blowing the shit out of the middle east for our freedom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom McB Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Shocking that this isn't getting more attention. Carpet. Swept. Under. ? http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5413/mp-paedophiles-were-untouchables-ex-special-branch-officer#.VHEB-1pDFB4.twitter Not getting more attention? What planet are you on? 2 days ago. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/retired-scotland-yard-detectives-back-4678189 a week ago http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2837175/MP-told-police-VIP-paedophile-ring-s-parties-26-years-Labour-s-John-Mann-claims-handed-evidence-abuse- Scotland-Yard-investigation-shelved.html 5 months ago http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/07/08/westminster-paedophile-ring-powerful-elite_n_5565972.html 7 months ago http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27047442 Or you could read the numerous post on Beastwatch in General nonsense. Been all over the main stream media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamdunk Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 ^^^ not sure if serious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom McB Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 ^^^ not sure if serious Deadly serious. Could turn out thousands of links. Google Westminister paedophile network, 134,000 links. If anyone is unaware of the allegations they must have been asleep for over thirty years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamdunk Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 OK, but considering Kim Kardashian's arse was in every paper last week, the links in your post seem very sporadic in terms of media coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom McB Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 OK, but considering Kim Kardashian's arse was in every paper last week, the links in your post seem very sporadic in terms of media coverage. 134,000 links sporadic? IN every paper from the mail to the graun. C'mon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BerwickMad Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Not sure where people have been hiding, but this is all over the place. The story will only get bigger too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamdunk Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 134,000 links sporadic? IN every paper from the mail to the graun. C'mon. Was talkng about your first post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crùbag Posted November 24, 2014 Author Share Posted November 24, 2014 Aye, loads of links but mostly to 'conspiracy' type websites. It is getting more coverage but it still seems somewhat muted when compared to the expenses scandal that broke a couple of years ago. Just saw some Ukip ex-high-heid-yin has been done for this type of porn on his PC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broomhill Ultra Posted November 25, 2014 Share Posted November 25, 2014 Aye, loads of links but mostly to 'conspiracy' type websites. It is getting more coverage but it still seems somewhat muted when compared to the expenses scandal that broke a couple of years ago. Just saw some Ukip ex-high-heid-yin has been done for this type of porn on his PC. You want to get angry about something? Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen's new Xmas wonderland was quite underwhelming for numerous Midlands families. Aaaargh it makes me mad. Thankfully the BBC are all over it like, well like a BBC 'celebrity' on a 13 year old girl actually. Funny dat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted November 25, 2014 Share Posted November 25, 2014 134,000 links sporadic? IN every paper from the mail to the graun. C'mon. Why's it not been treated like the huge story it is then? It should be over the papers, tele, radio etc but it's really not I'm afraid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted November 25, 2014 Share Posted November 25, 2014 134,000 links sporadic? IN every paper from the mail to the graun. C'mon. Wow a whole 134,000 links. Google results Tom McB is tedious = 16,500,000 How to turn fairy dust into gold = 628,000 Tom McB searches for fairy dust = 900,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dipped Flake Posted November 25, 2014 Share Posted November 25, 2014 I haven't heard a thing about this until seeing this thread. I don't read papers much but I do watch the news and can't say I remember anything on the BBC about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClydeNewcomer Posted November 25, 2014 Share Posted November 25, 2014 134,000 links sporadic? IN every paper from the mail to the graun. C'mon. It is mentioned in a column. It will not pursue the case everyday all over the front pages as it should. They like to give the public little snip-its of what is going on and then drop it knowing full well people will forget. The vast majority of the public only react and get involved if something is continently repeated on the front pages of newspapers. Repetition repetition repetition whips the public into a frenzy. The oldest trick in the book If it leads to a few individual politicians then the story could be huge and all over the papers but if it leads to the network involved which includes a sea of very powerful people you can bet your life the media will not mention it or play it down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabinoban Posted November 26, 2014 Share Posted November 26, 2014 Justice isn't helped when laws are rushed through to keep secrets about the royal family from getting in the papers just when the investigation starts. Funny that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
czechczechmanov Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 This is fucking stupid..It's the Catholic Church "problem" all over again.Statistically a priest is no more likely to sexually abuse a child than an average person on the street, in fact they're slightly less likely to goingby statistics.Yet a few cases make the news and suddenly all priests are pedophiles and the Catholic Church "needs to address this problem"..There are a lot of politicians, there are a lot of police officers, there are a lot of civilians.When you have a large body of people THERE WILL ALWAYS be criminals within that body.Statistically speaking a politician is no more likely to be a pedophile, but again because of a few cases they're all cast a suspicious glance and told to "address their problem".Queue more knee jerk reactions and hysteria from the British public.You're always going to have fucking crime, you complete retards.This particular crime is actually EXTREMELY rare (as is sexual crime in general in the UK).It's already being addressed as well as it possibly can be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.