Jump to content

Naismith or Fletcher?Can we play the two?


Dryhorce

Recommended Posts

Watching Naismith today looks the part another goal against Arsenal has started the season sharper for sure.

Or should we try a 4 4 1 1 and play them both Naismith made a good chance in that area today with a header

Was think you could do that and lay it on for big Fletcher

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Fletcher even fit? Naismith is a stick on to start against Germany, if he remains fit that is.

I've been impressed with SNupfront, atm Fletcher needs to get fit and in form to force his way back into the side. SN hasn't done anything wrong to lose his place in the team.

Good problem to have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been impressed with SNupfront, atm Fletcher needs to get fit and in form to force his way back into the side. SN hasn't done anything wrong to lose his place in the team.

Good problem to have.

I agree he is in the driving seat for first pick.but do not forget RHODES and NAISMITH in behind him for Georgia surely we can do them they have lost players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree he is in the driving seat for first pick.but do not forget RHODES and NAISMITH in behind him for Georgia surely we can do them they have lost players

SN is in charge of the no 9 shirt, for def.

Hopefully Rhodes can clinch his prem move, get a glut of goals and Fletcher can find his form for Sunderland too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SN is in charge of the no 9 shirt, for def.

Hopefully Rhodes can clinch his prem move, get a glut of goals and Fletcher can find his form for Sunderland too.

Blackburn say he is not for sale earlier today.there are out to try and get promoted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naismith used to play left midfield for Scotland under Craig Levein and George Burley but obviously plays better as a centre forward, I wouldn't pair them against Germany but surely its something that we should look at against Georgia in second match!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naismith used to play left midfield for Scotland under Craig Levein and George Burley but obviously plays better as a centre forward, I wouldn't pair them against Germany but surely its something that we should look at against Georgia in second match!

Guys versatile even play center of midfield for Rangers when he was called on.felt a bit sorry for him today even though I am a red

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been impressed with SNupfront, atm Fletcher needs to get fit and in form to force his way back into the side. SN hasn't done anything wrong to lose his place in the team.

Good problem to have.

So have I, took his goal well yesterday although through the keepers legs. As much as I like him as a player and he does link up well with the midfield, I think the one up top suits Fletcher more. Surprisingly SN wins many headers and like I said links up well with the midfield, but he suits playing with a strike partner.

I'd still like him to start and he deserves it on current form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Snograss injured, yes. Naismith can play anywhere in the three positions behind the striker and is good at timing his runs into the box. With a proper pre-season, Fletcher can be great for us. He's got the best first touch in our squad and Strachan has mentioned this before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strachan is likely to pick players based on various things (overall ability, strengths and weaknesses of the opposition, international record etc), probably the most important thing is current form / confidence. While we've had a few players like Hutton and McFadden who seemed to be able to turn it on for Scotland despite not playing for their clubs, generally I would much rather have players who are doing well every week.

A couple of seasons ago there would have been no question that Fletcher was the first choice Nbr 9 as he was scoring goals at a good level while Naismith was struggling to get a game for Everton. Now Naismith is bang in form and is currently playing right up front with lukaku out on the right, so he has to play there against Germany. If he gets injured then we'll have to use Fletcher which is a good back up to have.

By the end of the season it may be Fletcher who's the man in form and then it might make more sense to play Naismith at Nbr 10 or leave him on the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naismith for me on his own. He's good enough in the air to pose an attacking threat from crosses.

Just need the 3 in behind to make themselves available for through balls and layoffs.

Scotland don't really play 3 in behind though. It's generally been Snodgrass, Maloney or Morrison off the central striker.

There's a case for saying playing Naismith off Fletcher would have little effect on our formation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scotland don't really play 3 in behind though. It's generally been Snodgrass, Maloney or Morrison off the central striker.

There's a case for saying playing Naismith off Fletcher would have little effect on our formation.

We can't not play Naismith - but he doesn't score goals!

3 for Scotland in almost 30 appearances and a fairly average return at club level will not qualify us for the Championships. In support of a Fletcher (albeit with a poor international record), Rhodes or Martin then he has a huge role to play.

Up front on his own? Not convinced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many of those games has he started as centre forward? Assuming we have an attacking 4, Naismith can play any of those positions. The question isn't really can Naismith and Fletcher play together, Naismith is versatile enough that they can in our current formation. It's more is Fletcher good enough to be a lone striker? What he lacks in pace he makes up for in touch and strength, with Naismith behind him I think they could work well together. Naismith is a definite starter for the foreseeable future though, so the question is if Fletcher is better than any of the three attacking midfielders supporting Naismith in any given game. So there's two questions I suppose.

ETA: The issue I think is most managers don't fancy Fletcher's energy levels as a lone striker. Especially important in games where we're not going to see much of the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many of those games has he started as centre forward? Assuming we have an attacking 4, Naismith can play any of those positions. The question isn't really can Naismith and Fletcher play together, Naismith is versatile enough that they can in our current formation. It's more is Fletcher good enough to be a lone striker? What he lacks in pace he makes up for in touch and strength, with Naismith behind him I think they could work well together. Naismith is a definite starter for the foreseeable future though, so the question is if Fletcher is better than any of the three attacking midfielders supporting Naismith in any given game. So there's two questions I suppose.

ETA: The issue I think is most managers don't fancy Fletcher's energy levels as a lone striker. Especially important in games where we're not going to see much of the ball.

You're probably right - yet Mario Frick has a decent goal return for one of the worst teams in Europe and he was awful.

Kenny Miller played up front on his own with pace and yet his goal return is not substantially better than Frick's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...