Jump to content

Murrayfield should be the new home of cup semi finals & finals.


DavieCFC

Recommended Posts

After my first ever visit to Murrayfield to watch Celtic yesterday, i really do think the SPFL (or whoever it was that said it) really is serious about ditching Hampden, then this is the venue to move the games too.

I dont really care about what the purists about Hampden (the history, its our home etc...), the fact of the matter it really is a disgrace to call this place our national staduim. Its not confortable, the view is utter pish (especially if your behind the goals) and it doesnt hold the atmosphere as well as other staduims in scotland (running track keeping the fans quite a distance away from the pitch really doesnt help). Leave it to host atheltics events, its not gunna enough for big footballing events.

The whole set up at Murrayfield is great, its really easy to get to, the setup to get in is very well done and theres plenty of space to get in and roam around when you get inside to just enjoy the occasion. I was really impressed.

The national side should take a leaf out of Germany's book and play their home matches throughout the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Murrayfield is a superb stadium and if Hampden hadn't been rebuilt then yes I think something could have been worked out for football but the reality is that Hampden has had a lot of money invested in it so it must be used to pay for itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scottish football has little enough money without handing over a large slice to RFU, for that reason I doubt will get past first base as an option

A large slice? What does it cost to hire Murrayfield, Ibrox & Parkhead?

Murrayfield holds 7000 more than Celtic Park and almost 17000 more than Ibrox. They might well be able to generate enough income from the increased capacities to put as much 'back into football' as they would from the Glasgow clubs. It must surely be the case with Ibrox at least.

Anyway, this myth about money better off going to 'football' rather then rugby. How does giving money to the Old Firm help Scottish football? It harms it by giving them additional income. Just what Scottish football needs.

The reason Murrayfield isn't used is because of reverse snobbery and the fact it's not in Glasgow, made even worse by the fact it's in Edinburgh. The SFA only care about 3 grounds, 2 clubs and 1 city. It'll never change, much to the detriment of Scottish football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen but Murrayfield is far superior for spectators. Plus I like the idea of playing big games in the capital.

This. I can get a bus from my house straight up to Murrayfield :thumsup2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an absolute travesty that Scotland will play their home European qualifier matches at Snake Mountain rather than at the 67,000 capacity stadium that is Murrayfield in the capital city. An absolute fucking travesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is the fact that Edinburgh is the capital city in any way relevant here? Glasgow is the biggest city and is a traditionally more football-oriented place. Edinburgh doesn't even have a top flight club.

I can walk to Murrayfield in about 45 seconds, but I still think Hampden is the best place to have these matches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is the fact that Edinburgh is the capital city in any way relevant here? Glasgow is the biggest city and is a traditionally more football-oriented place. Edinburgh doesn't even have a top flight club.

I can walk to Murrayfield in about 45 seconds, but I still think Hampden is the best place to have these matches.

Murrayfield resident in being against big events being held at Murrayfield shocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one big issue that Murrayfield has is that it isn't really set up for segregation. That wouldn't exactly go well when certain teams play each other.

I'd suggest that says more about certain teams than it does about Murrayfield though.

The ideal scenario here is that Hampden is bulldozed and a new stadium built to replace it - in Glasgow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one big issue that Murrayfield has is that it isn't really set up for segregation. That wouldn't exactly go well when certain teams play each other.

I think they could probably manage to segregate it reasonably enough by asking one team to enter through Roseburn Park and the other through the gates across from the tram stop on Roseburn Street. I'm sure fences and stuff could be put up inside the grounds of the stadium

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Scotland as a whole Murrayfield in unquestionably the best option. Glaswegians would be seething though and there's too much politics at play for it to ever happen.

Small-mindedness wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Scotland as a whole Murrayfield in unquestionably the best option. Glaswegians would be seething though and there's too much politics at play for it to ever happen. Small-mindedness wins.

Why would it be better for "Scotland as a whole" to move it away from the biggest population centre?

And Glasgow only has one. Dundee is the superpower now. .

Glasgow has two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that pisses me off more about Hampden than anything else is getting to and from there.

You can wait ridiculous times for a train, normally in the pissing rain. Can't even go into a nearby pub to wait because they are always packed.

If they could sort out the transport links and the view from some parts of the stadium,Hampden would be perfect.

Just now though I'd have to sway towards Murrayfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...