[Rugster]

strathspey thistle, on 11 February 2012 - 15:56, said:

ferguson DIDNT say he shouldnt play for man utd again ,but said Suarez shouldnt play for liverpool for similar

[Rock Legend SMFC]

You must be an attention-seeking c**t to defend Suarez today.

[Marshmallo]

banana, on 11 February 2012 - 15:43, said:

55 million on him and Carroll

Will someone please think of the children!

Plus another 20m on Henderson.

[strathspey thistle]

Kris., on 11 February 2012 - 16:03, said:

Ferdinand has f**k all to do with this Evra-Suarez saga, he can do what he likes.

Suarez has a reason not to shake hands with EVra after whats gone on ,Ferdinand shouldnt of had a reason Suarez can also do as he likes and shouldnt have a idiot like Evra forcing him to shake

[strathspey thistle]

Rock Legend SMFC, on 11 February 2012 - 16:06, said:

You must be an attention-seeking c**t to defend Suarez today.

no he has done nothing wrong today

[Kris.]

strathspey thistle, on 11 February 2012 - 16:08, said:

Suarez has a reason not to shake hands with EVra after whats gone on ,Ferdinand shouldnt of had a reason Suarez can also do as he likes and shouldnt have a idiot like Evra forcing him to shake

Ferdinand refused to shake Suarez's hand after he'd rejected Evras handshake. There's his reason if you really need one.

[South Lanarkshire Jag]

Kris., on 11 February 2012 - 16:13, said:

Ferdinand refused to shake Suarez's hand after he'd rejected Evras handshake. There's his reason if you really need one.

So did Welbeck.

[Raven]

Rugster, on 11 February 2012 - 16:04, said:

have to admit, I'm going to have a beer or 2 to see if i can make sense of that one afterwards.

[JamboMikey]

At the end of the day Man United have pumped their vastly inferior rivals and are top of the Premier League.

[dundeefc1783]

I don't particularly like Suarez and am not condoning what he done but am I the only one who thinks Evra is a total tosser
And to say he was just celebrating with fans, yeah just coincidence that he had to almost barge past Suarez to do so.
Evra = p***k
And AF has a cheek saying that about Suarez after the exploits of some of his players over the years.
I agree with KD with comments about media they totally blow these things out of all proportion.
And funny how Suarez is getting dog abuse in media yet John Terry isn't getting nearly as much stick in the media, because he is English?.
Surely not as that would be racist?

[Swampy]

dundeefc1783, on 11 February 2012 - 16:16, said:

I don't particularly like Suarez and am not condoning what he done but am I the only one who thinks Evra is a total tosser
And to say he was just celebrating with fans, yeah just coincidence that he had to almost barge past Suarez to do so.
Evra = p***k
And AF has a cheek saying that about Suarez after the exploits of some of his players over the years.
I agree with KD with comments about media they totally blow these things out of all proportion.
And funny how Suarez is getting dog abuse in media yet John Terry isn't getting nearly as much stick in the media, because he is English?.
Surely not as that would be racist?

I think it's because Terry's case is sub judice that the media are being quiet. If you look on Twitter, forums etc. he's certainly getting enough abuse from fans.

[South Lanarkshire Jag]

dundeefc1783, on 11 February 2012 - 16:16, said:

And funny how Suarez is getting dog abuse in media yet John Terry isn't getting nearly as much stick in the media, because he is English?.

Suarez was found guilty and banned.

Terry is still to stand trial. Innocent until proven guilty and all that

[dundeefc1783]

South Lanarkshire Jag said:

1328977186[/url]' post='5959603']
Suarez was found guilty and banned.

Terry is still to stand trial. Innocent until proven guilty and all that

Yeah but it's says a lot that Suarez was dealt with by the fa but Terry is going through the criminal courts
I think that says a lot

[Raven]

South Lanarkshire Jag, on 11 February 2012 - 16:19, said:

Terry is still to stand trial. Innocent until proven guilty and all that

In law perhaps, even if not in the eyes of the FA.

[Swampy]

dundeefc1783, on 11 February 2012 - 16:23, said:

Yeah but it's says a lot that Suarez was dealt with by the fa but Terry is going through the criminal courts
I think that says a lot

What does it say, exactly? Your original contention was that Terry was being protected while Suarez was being castigated due to racism. How does this fit into that?

[South Lanarkshire Jag]

dundeefc1783, on 11 February 2012 - 16:23, said:

Yeah but it's says a lot that Suarez was dealt with by the fa but Terry is going through the criminal courts
I think that says a lot

Contradicting yourself.

The Court's are dealing with it, because someone complained about watching it on T.V.

[dundeefc1783]

Swampy said:

1328977452[/url]' post='5959613']
What does it say, exactly? Your original contention was that Terry was being protected while Suarez was being castigated due to racism. How does this fit into that?

It says to me that the police feel that the Suarez incident did not merit a criminal investigation but the Terry incident was not only serious enough for him to be investigated criminally but also to be reported for the incident.

[Swampy]

dundeefc1783, on 11 February 2012 - 16:27, said:

It says to me that the police feel that the Suarez incident did not merit a criminal investigation but the Terry incident was not only serious enough for him to be investigated criminally but also to be reported for the incident.

Right... and what's that got to do with Suarez's being banned by the FA?

[Highlandmagyar]

F_T_Y, on 11 February 2012 - 15:50, said:

Racist or not he done well not to react at the end,Man u are a classless bunch.

Pot, kettle, black. You are hilarious.

[dundeefc1783]

Swampy said:

1328977781[/url]' post='5959622']
Right... and what's that got to do with Suarez's being banned by the FA?

My point is that media have handed out plenty of stick towards Suarez yet from what I have seen hardly any stick has been aimed at Terry
So KD has a point when he says that the media have not helped.

[Swampy]

dundeefc1783, on 11 February 2012 - 16:33, said:

My point is that media have handed out plenty of stick towards Suarez yet from what I have seen hardly any stick has been aimed at Terry
So KD has a point when he says that the media have not helped.

I pointed out why the media have been very quiet on Terry: because it's under criminal investigation. If he's found guilty you won't be able to move for negative stories for a good few days.

[Raven]

dundeefc1783, on 11 February 2012 - 16:33, said:

My point is that media have handed out plenty of stick towards Suarez yet from what I have seen hardly any stick has been aimed at Terry
So KD has a point when he says that the media have not helped.

come on, behave. The Suarez-Evra incident couldn't have gone to court. Something to do with, lack of evidence. They must believe they have sufficient evidence against Terry.

[Raven]

Highlandmagyar, on 11 February 2012 - 16:31, said:

Pot, kettle, black. You are hilarious.

Are you insinuating that the pot is in breach of FA rule E3(2) ?

[DomDom]

I don't think it's a surprise that the only ones supporting Suarez are a bit special.

So basically, lets just ignore them and move on.

[dundeefc1783]

[quote name='Raven' timestamp='1328978283' post='5959653']
come on, behave. The Suarez-Evra incident couldn't have gone to court. Something to do with, lack of evidence. They must believe they have sufficient evidence against Terry.
[/quote


I'm not defending Suarez in any way as I don't particularly like him but just wondering if there is not enough evidence to put a case to the courts what evidence did the FA find him guilty on, was it Evra's word against Suarez?