[craigkillie]

tigerton, on 05 February 2012 - 17:57, said:

Kindly f**k up.

United had 4 penalty claims, 3 of which were stone wallers and he gave 2.

Which 3 were "stonewallers"? The only clear one was the shirt pull on Young in the first half.

[tigerton]

craigkillie, on 05 February 2012 - 17:56, said:

Two great saves from de Gea. Not convinced either shot was going in though.

I think Matas would have clipped the inside of the post and gone in. One of those ones where the commentators say shit like 'three keepers wouldn't have saved that'

[Kilwinning Ranger]

Amazing

It just shows Man U can never be written off

Still i think the goalie is not the answer

[tigerton]

craigkillie, on 05 February 2012 - 17:58, said:

Which 3 were "stonewallers"? The only clear one was the shirt pull on Young in the first half.

That one.

Cahills tackle was a clear foul, and the contact that made Welbeck (I think) go down was inside the box.
Sturridges tackle on Evra was a clear foul.

Also, the one from Ivanovic was a carbon copy of the one City got yesterday. Although that has no bearing on todays game obvs, just thought I'd mention it...

[Disco Duck]

Disco Duck, on 05 February 2012 - 17:45, said:

After posting that, I did - at 8/1...

Hello £82.94.

[Bogs_Dollox]

Distant Doonhamer, on 05 February 2012 - 17:57, said:

Never in doubt

[craigkillie]

tigerton, on 05 February 2012 - 18:03, said:

That one.

Cahills tackle was a clear foul, and the contact that made Welbeck (I think) go down was inside the box.
Sturridges tackle on Evra was a clear foul.

Also, the one from Ivanovic was a carbon copy of the one City got yesterday. Although that has no bearing on todays game obvs, just thought I'd mention it...

The Cahill one was a good yard outside the box.

Sturridge on Evra was a 60% penalty. You get them more often than not, but Evra made a meal of it.

Welbeck conned the ref for his one.

[Dazzle]

tigerton, on 05 February 2012 - 17:57, said:

Kindly f**k up.

United had 4 penalty claims, 3 of which were stone wallers and he gave 2.

Behave. The Young one was a pen, the Evra was debateable but certainlynot a "stonewaller" and the other two were laughable.

[Diamonds are Forever]

craigkillie, on 05 February 2012 - 18:22, said:

The Cahill one was a good yard outside the box.

Sturridge on Evra was a 60% penalty. You get them more often than not, but Evra made a meal of it.

Welbeck conned the ref for his one.

Very debatable, he shoves into Welbeck which occurs outside the box, but when he slides in he trips Welbeck by which point they are right on the line.

Evra was 100% a penalty, Sturridge clearly kicks Evra's foot, making a meal of it doesn't make it any less of a penalty.

Welbeck did con the referee for the last one though.

[Disco Duck]

AVB looked like he was going to cry in the post-match interview. No doubt thinking about Mr Abramovic releasing the hounds later tonight.

[tigerton]

I will need to look at the Cahill one again, but I think the contact that brings Welbeck down is inside the box.

However, you cant defend the penalty given for the foul on Evra. he kicks him, in the box, its not even debatable.

Considering the decisions that went against United at Stamford Bridge the past 2 seasons, the fact that the 'Howard Webb plays for United' brigade are out in force tonight is fucking laughable.

[JamboMikey]

[David W]

tigerton, on 05 February 2012 - 19:36, said:

I will need to look at the Cahill one again, but I think the contact that brings Welbeck down is inside the box.

However, you cant defend the penalty given for the foul on Evra. he kicks him, in the box, its not even debatable.

I think it is debatable. I've seen it a couple of times and I'm not seeing much difference between it and the Welbeck/Ivanovic one which most people are saying was an incorrect decision.

[Mr. Brightside]

Bosingwa - Young - Nothing
Cahill - Welbeck - Foul
Sturridge - Evra - Soft penalty, but a penalty nonetheless.
Ivanovic - Welbeck - Never a penalty.

This post has been edited by Mr. Brightside: 06 February 2012 - 22:31