[youngsy]

Henrik, on 03 February 2012 - 10:18, said:

Oh dear. This again?

Do you think Rangers will win the case?

I have no idea,same as yourself. So i take it that will be a no from yourself about having a source or an insight to the tribunal findings. So at this moment in time nothing can be determined as to Rangers being involved in tax evasion.

[Henrik's tongue]

Shady enough goings on to merit an investigation though, eh? Even a rank and filer like yourself can't deny that.

[The Taxman]

youngsy, on 03 February 2012 - 10:38, said:

I have no idea,same as yourself. So i take it that will be a no from yourself about having a source or an insight to the tribunal findings. So at this moment in time nothing can be determined as to Rangers being involved in tax evasion.

I told you there was a story breaking about Rangers ST money, I told you Rangers would not sign Holt and you laughed away these suggestions.

I'm telling you that Rangers will lose the tax case, and working for HMRC my source is me.

Lets see if I'm right eh?

[youngsy]

The Taxman, on 03 February 2012 - 10:47, said:

I told you there was a story breaking about Rangers ST money, I told you Rangers would not sign Holt and you laughed away these suggestions.

I'm telling you that Rangers will lose the tax case, and working for HMRC my source is me.

Lets see if I'm right eh?

What the f**k are you on about as regards Holt and the ST money. I take it you're generalising about telling Rangers fans on here rather than me personally because this is the first i've seen anything from you regarding both instances. As for you and HMRC you're surmising about the outcome nothing more or less. You know as much as me or anyone else but you're going with your preferred outcome and that's all. Does this story of you being a HMRC employee make it relevant that every employee will have access to the outcome. In that case my own daughter should have knowledge of the outcome as she's also an employee of HMRC and btw whether you are or not doesn't interest me.. Away and give us peace you stupid soft c unt. Your hoping for an outcome against the club when if right you can put your hand up in an "i told you so "way. You're a f ucking idiot.

[The Taxman]

youngsy, on 03 February 2012 - 11:47, said:

What the f**k are you on about as regards Holt and the ST money. I take it you're generalising about telling Rangers fans on here rather than me personally because this is the first i've seen anything from you regarding both instances. As for you and HMRC you're surmising about the outcome nothing more or less. You know as much as me or anyone else but you're going with your preferred outcome and that's all. Does this story of you being a HMRC employee make it relevant that every employee will have access to the outcome. In that case my own daughter should have knowledge of the outcome as she's also an employee of HMRC and btw whether you are or not doesn't interest me.. Away and give us peace you stupid soft c unt. Your hoping for an outcome against the club when if right you can put your hand up in an "i told you so "way. You're a f ucking idiot.

oooff, feel the rage.

I told you the night before the story broke it would be in the record and you dismissed it as a lot of pish. I was right.

I told you there was no chance of Rangers signing Holt and you said that was pish. I was right

I am telling you Rangers will lose the tax case..I AM RIGHT.

You don't have the best record here, so if i were you I would keep it shut and "wait and see"

You are only makeing yourself out to be a denialist, raging misinformed twat.

[youngsy]

Henrik, on 03 February 2012 - 10:45, said:

Shady enough goings on to merit an investigation though, eh? Even a rank and filer like yourself can't deny that.

HMRC have completed their investigation and presented their case,Rangers have put their case across. We'll see outcome in due course. If it goes against the club then we'll have to deal with it. Goes our way then great.

[magee84]

Boys got anger management problems eh?
BTW im a self-employed plumbing & heating engineer and due to the mild winter/credit crunch work & money are tight just now
I was thinking of getting one of those payday loans and pay it back bit by bit against my next 4 boiler jobs, my tax return is also due for payment but i was thinking of saying 'f**k it' & going into bankruptcy so they & tickete.... i mean payday loan company can suck a fart out my arse for their money. If they want ti deduct points from me ive six on my driving license they can have???!!!
Im off to look at the plans for the casino on my roof and my sliding, rectractable garden !

[youngsy]

The Taxman, on 03 February 2012 - 11:53, said:

oooff, feel the rage.

I told you the night before the story broke it would be in the record and you dismissed it as a lot of pish. I was right.

I told you there was no chance of Rangers signing Holt and you said that was pish. I was right

I am telling you Rangers will lose the tax case..I AM RIGHT.

You don't have the best record here, so if i were you I would keep it shut and "wait and see"

You are only makeing yourself out to be a denialist, raging misinformed twat.

You're a no mark on an internet forum,same as us all, who is only surmising the outcome,nothing else. As for the ST money you mentioned it on the same night it broke on other forums and twitter,now as i think about it. As for Holt don't think you told me anything about him. As for this "feel the rage"nonsense,grow up you stupid c unt.

[The Taxman]

youngsy, on 03 February 2012 - 12:04, said:

As for the ST money you mentioned it on the same night it broke on other forums and twitter,now as i think about it.

That's right, I did and you knew nothing about it and said it was alot of shite, good of you to admit that you were wrong though. very big of you.



You should listen more to those in the know, is the lesson to be learned here.

[youngsy]

The Taxman, on 03 February 2012 - 12:10, said:

That's right, I did and you knew nothing about it and said it was alot of shite, good of you to admit that you were wrong though. very big of you.



You should listen more to those in the know, is the lesson to be learned here.

Won't be from you though,that's a certainty. Forecasting Rangers will lose the tax case isn't exactly being in the know,after all it's a 50/50 bet.

[The Taxman]

youngsy, on 03 February 2012 - 12:20, said:

Won't be from you though,that's a certainty. Forecasting Rangers will lose the tax case isn't exactly being in the know,after all it's a 50/50 bet.

http://www.pieandbov...r/page__st__125

That's the page where I told you that Holt WOULD NOT be signing for Rangers BTW.

Remember a few posts ago you said I NEVER EVEN mentioned Holt to you...?

youngsy, on 03 February 2012 - 12:04, said:

As for Holt don't think you told me anything about him.

Failing miserably today eh?

This post has been edited by The Taxman: 03 February 2012 - 12:31

[youngsy]

The Taxman, on 03 February 2012 - 12:26, said:

http://www.pieandbov...r/page__st__125

That's the page where I told you that Holt WOULD NOT be signing for Rangers BTW.

Remember a few posts ago you said I NEVER EVEN mentioned Holt to you...?

Failing miserably today eh?

Unlike you i don't bother trying to remember who posts what on a football forum. It's really of an irrelevance to me but if it makes you the man in the know you carry on. Means absolutely f uck all to me though.

[The Taxman]

youngsy, on 03 February 2012 - 12:33, said:

Unlike you i don't bother trying to remember who posts what on a football forum. It's really of an irrelevance to me but if it makes you the man in the know you carry on. Means absolutely f uck all to me though.

But you SEEMED so sure. Anyway, apology accepted

[youngsy]

The Taxman, on 03 February 2012 - 12:35, said:

But you SEEMED so sure. Anyway, apology accepted

Why would i apologise to a no mark such as yourself.

[canonbie man]

Jinky67, on 02 February 2012 - 14:15, said:

And in that respect you would be right. Although our revenue would be down and we would have to downsize we should still be scooping up the vast majority of trophies and that is why i think Celtic would pursue entry into another league.

Fantasy it may be but if Cardiff and Swansea can cain entry into England then why not Celtic on their own? Celtic and Rangers together are an unattractive prospect due to the way they bring out the worst in each others support but that would no longer be a problem.

Even now i would like to see Celtic compete in the English Championship. A good competitive league at a good standard and with decent revenue streams which could only improve our side.

Nothing wrong with fantasy though, a man walking on the moon was once fantasy as was a black president in the USA. Shit happens and things change.

cardiff and swansea have been in the english league since they started as clubs,celtic and rangers could easily apply to join the english league ,but they would have to start at the bottom tier which is roughly 12 divisions below the premiership ; I would suggest both teams do this now and after 11 promotions they could sit comfortably at the top table; it's the fact that they want to be parachuted into the top league straight away that sticks in the throat of the english clubs;I also beleive the scottish league would in turn become more competitive with the clubs that remain being of a similar standard, and even more attractive to the outside world without the bigot twins

[Tim Malloy]

From KDS.

[bennett]

X marks the spot


Keep up the good work T*m.

[Tim Malloy]

bennett, on 03 February 2012 - 17:55, said:

X marks the spot


Keep up the good work T*m.

oh! good! An oxymoron from some poxy moron!

[Henrik's tongue]

Don't make fun of the skintos TM. They don't like it.