Interesting to read this, as it's the first I've heard about it for a long time.
It's crazy that Aberdeen has been chosen, I presume, as the sole venue to cover the Highlands, since it effectively eliminates any promising youngsters from half of the country, and demonstrates the total lack of understanding of the difficulties faced by youth in the Highlands.
The distances needing travelled are far far larger than in the central belt. As an example, Inverness - Aberdeen takes, at the very best, 2 hours one way. Usually 2 1/2. A similar distance from Glasgow would be to Montrose, & any suggestion that parents and kids from Glasgow should travel that distance would be quite rightly laughed at.
And what about kids from West & North of Inverness, since Aberdeen is presumably serving these areas too, all the way outward to the islands. What chance have they got?
If the plan is to find & nurture the best talent Scotland has to offer, the first criteria absolutely must be to be inclusive for all, as best as can be managed. Aberdeen, much though it's a fantastic city, is perched on the far east coast & fails in this most basic concept.
To achieve this, I'd have thought use of the fantastic facility at Dingwall should have been first choice to cover the northern Highlands, and thereafter somewhere on the Moray Firth, maybe in Moray. Keith High now has superb 3g all weather pitches. A combination of these would go a long way to open up the entire country, by making travelling times, and cost, more achievable.
It's yet another central belt view of Scotland, it's an opportunity missed, and another generation from half the geographical area of Scotland are denied.
The £60m could be used far more effectively, and those responsible should be taking a long hard look at themselves.
This post has been edited by fitba: 14 February 2012 - 11:34