Cicero, on 04 January 2012 - 17:28, said:
With regard to the under achieving bit, it was a bit tongue in cheek on my part (
I believe that Stirling are a good team but the point of my original post was to point out that there are a few good teams in the league. The way a couple of the previous posts read that they are the best, I honestly do not believe that they are. They are certainly not much better than Gretna as this season's results show. A couple of Stirling posters have said that Gretna are not going to finish anywhere near the top of the league so where does that put Stirling? Not much higher.
Cicero is right Stirling are not as good as they should be for all the resources they have. The coaches encourage too much direct play. Most of the better players get frustrated by this. Stirling were much more attractive to watch when Raleigh Gowrie was in charge, now they just play like every other team, but they are blessed with some good players and its them who've got the good results.

Sign In »
Register Now!
Help

Back to top












