[HibeeJibee]

Busta Nut, on 14 September 2011 - 12:42, said:

I tghink Sion should have been kicked out, but not replaced by Celtic

Why not, exactly ? They beat Celtic 3-1 with half a team on players who shouldn't have been on the park, one of whom scored 2 goals... And drawing a 'lucky loser' (which could still be Celtic) would be a bizarre alternative solution, surely.

[itzdrk]

HibeeJibee, on 14 September 2011 - 18:27, said:

Why not, exactly ? They beat Celtic 3-1 with half a team on players who shouldn't have been on the park, one of whom scored 2 goals... And drawing a 'lucky loser' (which could still be Celtic) would be a bizarre alternative solution, surely.

they should have picked a team who won a game if they HAD to kick sion out

which they didnt

what celtic think about the sfa
thats what sion think about uefa

haha

[HibeeJibee]

itzdrk, on 14 September 2011 - 20:52, said:

they should have picked a team who won a game if they HAD to kick sion out

which they didnt

This makes no sense. They did have to kick Sion out (realistically): and why should they have to replace them with someone who 'won a game' instead of the team who lost to them? Celtic might have beaten a Sion XI comprising appropriately signed players, infact 2 of their 3 goals came from someone who shouldn't have been fielded.

[itzdrk]

HibeeJibee, on 14 September 2011 - 21:12, said:

This makes no sense. They did have to kick Sion out (realistically): and why should they have to replace them with someone who 'won a game' instead of the team who lost to them? Celtic might have beaten a Sion XI comprising appropriately signed players, infact 2 of their 3 goals came from someone who shouldn't have been fielded.

but according to the approved squad list

they should have been played

i suspect bribery

[Monkey]

itzdrk, on 13 September 2011 - 15:36, said:

http://news.bbc.co.u...ll/14900965.stm

Just hope Celtic have checked that everything they do is ok with UEFA rules with regard to who they play etc, before we go into this European adventure. Again

Also hope that someone at the club makes sure that any payments received for television,advertising etc are properly declared and taxed by HMRC to avoid any future problems.

For every fiver we spend, the tax man will be looking for 40 %, and it will be paid, just cos we can out of the biscuit tin

This post has been edited by Monkey: 14 September 2011 - 22:06

[Sarge Bullman]

WaffenThinMint, on 13 September 2011 - 21:54, said:

Well at least no one can claim it was a Sionist conspiracy.

I'll get my coat...

Jew really expect a laugh from that?

[Monster]

The most disappointing aspect of the decision for me is being unable to enjoy the hysterical paranoia that an upheld appeal would have engendered across the entire nation, mostly from mouth-breathers that have likely never been near a Celtic game in their lives.

Such is the gravity with which their slaverings are taken in this bizarre country we'd probably have also been able to enjoy Cardinal O'Someone and Paul McBride QC greeting on the news as well.

Never mind, we'll just have to wait until the next Old Firm game.