[The Woolshed]

Cracking performance from Selkirk Victoria at the Public Park today, thoroughly deserved 6-1 victory to all but seal promotion. Vastly improved performance from the past 4 games and sets us up nicely for what should be a good game against a Boswels side on good form

Lauder beating HOL aswel? Treato - what happened mate?

Roll on next weekend

[winaukee]

The Woolshed, on 05 March 2011 - 18:23, said:

Cracking performance from Selkirk Victoria at the Public Park today, thoroughly deserved 6-1 victory to all but seal promotion. Vastly improved performance from the past 4 games and sets us up nicely for what should be a good game against a Boswels side on good form

Lauder beating HOL aswel? Treato - what happened mate?

Roll on next weekend

We must bring the best of Selkirk since that's twice we have been humped off you. You have a really good unit and if you keep the players together next season should do really well in the B division. HOL losing is a major shock since alot of the boys predicted a Lauder win after playing them last week.

[treatocopshaw]

The Woolshed, on 05 March 2011 - 18:23, said:

Cracking performance from Selkirk Victoria at the Public Park today, thoroughly deserved 6-1 victory to all but seal promotion. Vastly improved performance from the past 4 games and sets us up nicely for what should be a good game against a Boswels side on good form

Lauder beating HOL aswel? Treato - what happened mate?

Roll on next weekend

usual story pal hearts cant get a settled team to travell away from home in saying that lauder deserved their win it was one all with about twenty to go but then lauder got two quick goals an it was all over looks like you boys dun us a favour the day though becuse were going to need all the help we can git to go up becuse were terrible on the road and weve still got gala and tweedmouth and hawick away and one at home

[shamrockteri]

treatocopshaw, on 05 March 2011 - 18:58, said:

usual story pal hearts cant get a settled team to travell away from home in saying that lauder deserved their win it was one all with about twenty to go but then lauder got two quick goals an it was all over looks like you boys dun us a favour the day though becuse were going to need all the help we can git to go up becuse were terrible on the road and weve still got gala and tweedmouth and hawick away and one at home

No disrespect to you and your team treato but if they will only turn up for home matches or ones close to the holm why did the club join the Border Am leagues?
I'd be well pissed off if my team could only be arsed to turn up to home games mate

[groundhopper]

shamrockteri, on 05 March 2011 - 19:09, said:

No disrespect to you and your team treato but if they will only turn up for home matches or ones close to the holm why did the club join the Border Am leagues?
I'd be well pissed off if my team could only be arsed to turn up to home games mate

Have to agree with this. Was at the game today, it was pretty close for much of the game but thought Lauder were probably worth their win. Have to say I was surprised to be asked (although jokingly !!) by one of the HoL bench if I'd brought my boots as they were down to the bare bones !! Now I see why, that is a bit of a poor situation. Feel sorry for all the guys who do put in a shift EVERY week.

[treatocopshaw]

groundhopper, on 05 March 2011 - 20:29, said:

Have to agree with this. Was at the game today, it was pretty close for much of the game but thought Lauder were probably worth their win. Have to say I was surprised to be asked (although jokingly !!) by one of the HoL bench if I'd brought my boots as they were down to the bare bones !! Now I see why, that is a bit of a poor situation. Feel sorry for all the guys who do put in a shift EVERY week.

that was me

[The Woolshed]

treatocopshaw, on 05 March 2011 - 20:51, said:

that was me

Right, I've got to ask. What role do u assume at HOL? Haha

[treatocopshaw]

groundhopper, on 05 March 2011 - 20:29, said:

Have to agree with this. Was at the game today, it was pretty close for much of the game but thought Lauder were probably worth their win. Have to say I was surprised to be asked (although jokingly !!) by one of the HoL bench if I'd brought my boots as they were down to the bare bones !! Now I see why, that is a bit of a poor situation. Feel sorry for all the guys who do put in a shift EVERY week.

its the same story every week 2players back but five missing althought to be fair we only had 2or 3 missin and had to make two subs b 4 half time and send on two 16 yearolds yeah its deppressing and now were beggining to wonder if we realy want to go up maybie we would be better having another year in the third and bring the young lads through but obviusly promotion is our goal

[treatocopshaw]

The Woolshed, on 05 March 2011 - 20:55, said:

Right, I've got to ask. What role do u assume at HOL? Haha

no2 and player wen the auld knee alows it or wen were away from holm and struggeling

[The Woolshed]

treatocopshaw, on 05 March 2011 - 21:03, said:

no2 and player wen the auld knee alows it or wen were away from holm and struggeling

Introduce yourself next time, get a drink with me and selkirk loyal

[treatocopshaw]

The Woolshed, on 05 March 2011 - 21:09, said:

Introduce yourself next time, get a drink with me and selkirk loyal

wildo mate with a bit o luck wel meet again next season or in a cup

[The Woolshed]

treatocopshaw, on 05 March 2011 - 21:36, said:

wildo mate with a bit o luck wel meet again next season or in a cup

I'd love a trip to newcastleton again. Best two weeks of the season

[groundhopper]

treatocopshaw, on 05 March 2011 - 20:51, said:

that was me

Really ? Good stuff, nice to meet you then !

When I get round to visiting Newcastleton, will look out for you and say hallo. Hope that things work out for the team long term.

[The Woolshed]

groundhopper, on 05 March 2011 - 22:09, said:

Really ? Good stuff, nice to meet you then !

When I get round to visiting Newcastleton, will look out for you and say hallo. Hope that things work out for the team long term.

Theyl go up, fact

[Selkirk Loyal]

Winaukee you're right that's two of our better performances this season against you, I have to ask though - what is with the zonal marking? It seemed that every time we had a corner or free kick we could float the ball in and there was no challenge - hence, two goals from me .

Vics look certain to go up. Going by Hearts' last few away games i'd be surprised if they picked up maximum points from their remaining away matches. But I still think they've done enough at home to get them up. Gala/Lauder/Hearts all have to play each other again so there's points to be dropped all over the place and ultimately these will decide who goes up.

REMAINING LEAGUE GAMES

Selkirk Vics (5 to play, 41 points)
Kelso Thistle (H)
Yetholm (H)
St. Boswells (H)
CFC Bowholm (H)
Hawick LR (A)

Hearts of Liddesdale (5 to play, 34 points)
Lauder (H)
Gala Hotspur (A)
Tweedmouth AC (A)
Hawick LR (A) (Sat 12/03/11)
Peebles RR (A)

Gala Hotspur (7 to play, 23 points)
Hearts of Liddesdale (H)
Lauder (H)
Hawick LR (H)
Tweedmouth AC (A)
CFC Bowholm (A)
Peebles RR (A) (Sat 12/03/11)
St. Boswells (A)

Lauder (8 to play, 20 points)
CFC Bowholm (H)
Hawick LR (H)
Peebles (H)
St. Boswells (H)
Tweedmouth AC (H) (Sat 12/03/11)
Hearts of Liddesdale (A)
Gala Hotspur (A)
Kelso Thistle (A)

This post has been edited by Selkirk Loyal: 07 March 2011 - 11:41

[winaukee]

Selkirk Loyal, on 07 March 2011 - 11:36, said:

Winaukee you're right that's two of our better performances this season against you, I have to ask though - what is with the zonal marking? It seemed that every time we had a corner or free kick we could float the ball in and there was no challenge - hence, two goals from me .

Vics look certain to go up. Going by Hearts' last few away games i'd be surprised if they picked up maximum points from their remaining away matches. But I still think they've done enough at home to get them up. Gala/Lauder/Hearts all have to play each other again so there's points to be dropped all over the place and ultimately these will decide who goes up.

Zonal marking was intorduced by me since we kept getting beat at corners when we man marked. It normally works and you are the only team that have scored against us from corners that I can think of. It didn't help not having the two biggest players in the team there but still no excuses since we still did it shite on Saturday.

Could be back to man marking next week since the intelligence of the players has also increased from earlier on in the season.

We need to win out to have any chance of going up but I honestly can't see that happening.

[UptheA7]

winaukee, on 07 March 2011 - 15:17, said:

Zonal marking was intorduced by me since we kept getting beat at corners when we man marked. It normally works and you are the only team that have scored against us from corners that I can think of. It didn't help not having the two biggest players in the team there but still no excuses since we still did it shite on Saturday.

Could be back to man marking next week since the intelligence of the players has also increased from earlier on in the season.

We need to win out to have any chance of going up but I honestly can't see that happening.

I hope you are not including Penny and Garry in that statement Winaukee

[winaukee]

UptheA7, on 07 March 2011 - 15:33, said:

I hope you are not including Penny and Garry in that statement Winaukee

Settle down! More meant Liam Hardie and Shaun Bell
Only think Garry and Penny has done is add a little bit of weight to the pack