Return to forums
Register new account
Login:

The Pie Shop: Partick Thistle - BoD failures & current PropCo Con / "Nice li - The Pie Shop

Jump to content


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Partick Thistle - BoD failures & current PropCo Con / "Nice li Compare and contrast with that of St Mirren, over past 12 years Rate Topic: -----

#1
User is offline   OTIG_FTOF 

  • Third Division Apprentice
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 682
  • Joined: 20-September 09
  • Team:Partick Thistle
There is a thread started on SPL forum re St Mirren fans supposedly about to protest about the running of the club.
Within it, Captain_Sensible posted a number of points which for me, is such a good illustration on how a club (historically in crowds, potential, and past achievements, are on a relative par with Thistle) can be turned around in many ways, if led by some half decent BoD - so I have borrowed CS's post for a specific thread on the current PTFC BoD in this 1st div forum.

I was damn unhappy when I read the latest 'developments' on the in-house PropCo 'deal' ('con' would be better word!), and start of the so-called consultation process, and even more-so now, having read CS's post re the SMFC BoD and past 12 years.

View PostCaptain_Sensible, on 16 March 2010 - 14:25, said:

I've been reading this guff on blackandwhitearmy.com and it really does beggar belief.

As the saying goes, "What have the Romans ever done for us?"

Now bearing in mind that the current BoD took over in 1998 when we were £3 million in debt, had a ground which was beginning to fall to pieces and were staring relegation to the Second Division in the face, this is what they have achieved:

1) Underwritten a share issue in 1998 which was largely ignored by the supporters to save the club from going under.

2) Underwritten a share issue in 1999 which was largely ignored by the supporters to build a new stand to allow us into the SPL.

3) Lent the club £650k to pay of Bill Barr and fund a planning application to turn Love Street into a supermarket.

4) Secured planning permission for a supermarket at Love Street against the recommendation of the planners and against the Local Plan.

5) Sold Love Street to Tesco for £12m.

6) Built a brand new stadium.

7) Cleared all the debts.

8 ) Built our own exclusive training ground, one of only 4 clubs in Scotland to have one.

9) Overseen a fourth successive season in the top flight for the first time in almost a quarter of a century.

10) Overseen us reaching our highest league finish in 20 years.

11) Overseen us reaching our first major final in 23 years and our first League Cup Final in 55 years.

It would actually be more appropriate if the BoD turned out in scarlet and blue scarves in protest at some of our lunatic supporters!


I have bolded a word or phrase in each point - Compare and contrast to what the BoD at Firhill have done (and, even more-so, haven't) done in the same period, since SaveTheJags, and:
1) A lot of credit imho should be given to the SMFC BoD for what they have done for SMFC, as detailed in the 11 points CS has listed. They have turned around a club that could have died on its arse and ended up yo-yoing between the 1st and 2nd Division, or even worse (on and off park) by now.
2) PTFC really has been landed with a bunch of useless, incompetent, self-serving, tightfisted idiots who have played musical chairs for over a decade and if listed, a 100+ points could be easily collated over their shortcomings, failures, fk-ups, lack of personal investment, and multiple other items that have ensured PTFC is a club that promised so much, could have been in a much better place than it is now, and 90% of the blame for our current sorry state lies firmly in the hands of current and recently departed individuals who have sat on the PTFC BoD.


Two questions, to conclude:
1) What do other Jags supporters think (regarding this thread and our BoD in comparison to whats happened at SMFC).
2) What the hell can be done about the current PTFC BoD and the "nice little retirement fund project" (an actual quote of one of the 'Thistle minded investors' who are primarily looking on the PropCo deal as a way to make money for themselves out of Thistle while ruining the stadium and club even further in the coming years, and who won't care one iota when Thistle go to the wall, cause they will be sitting in their luxury homes quaffing champagne and smoking cigars). Is there any way to stop this slow-motion everyone-can-see-it-coming train crash ?
0

#2
User is offline   Dublinjag 

  • Third Division Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,098
  • Joined: 07-September 08
  • Location:Timbuktu
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostOTIG_FTOF, on 16 March 2010 - 15:24, said:

There is a thread started on SPL forum re St Mirren fans supposedly about to protest about the running of the club.
Within it, Captain_Sensible posted a number of points which for me, is such a good illustration on how a club (historically in crowds, potential, and past achievements, are on a relative par with Thistle) can be turned around in many ways, if led by some half decent BoD - so I have borrowed CS's post for a specific thread on the current PTFC BoD in this 1st div forum.

I was damn unhappy when I read the latest 'developments' on the in-house PropCo 'deal' ('con' would be better word!), and start of the so-called consultation process, and even more-so now, having read CS's post re the SMFC BoD and past 12 years.



I have bolded a word or phrase in each point - Compare and contrast to what the BoD at Firhill have done (and, even more-so, haven't) done in the same period, since SaveTheJags, and:
1) A lot of credit imho should be given to the SMFC BoD for what they have done for SMFC, as detailed in the 11 points CS has listed. They have turned around a club that could have died on its arse and ended up yo-yoing between the 1st and 2nd Division, or even worse (on and off park) by now.
2) PTFC really has been landed with a bunch of useless, incompetent, self-serving, tightfisted idiots who have played musical chairs for over a decade and if listed, a 100+ points could be easily collated over their shortcomings, failures, fk-ups, lack of personal investment, and multiple other items that have ensured PTFC is a club that promised so much, could have been in a much better place than it is now, and 90% of the blame for our current sorry state lies firmly in the hands of current and recently departed individuals who have sat on the PTFC BoD.


Two questions, to conclude:
1) What do other Jags supporters think (regarding this thread and our BoD in comparison to whats happened at SMFC).
2) What the hell can be done about the current PTFC BoD and the "nice little retirement fund project" (an actual quote of one of the 'Thistle minded investors' who are primarily looking on the PropCo deal as a way to make money for themselves out of Thistle while ruining the stadium and club even further in the coming years, and who won't care one iota when Thistle go to the wall, cause they will be sitting in their luxury homes quaffing champagne and smoking cigars). Is there any way to stop this slow-motion everyone-can-see-it-coming train crash ?



Please don't tell me this PropCo deal will not benefit PTFC - as opposed to individuals - in future?
0

#3
User is offline   archie guevara 

  • Third Division Reserve
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 992
  • Joined: 15-November 09
  • Location:Habana, Cuba
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostDublinjag, on 16 March 2010 - 15:37, said:

Please don't tell me this PropCo deal will not benefit PTFC - as opposed to individuals - in future?


Where have you been?

Oh, that's right - the 70s.

Seriously though the OP is spot on. It's death by a thousand balls ups.
Seeking, but not expecting, rational debate between now and Autumn 2014
1

#4
User is offline   Lambie's Pigeon Feed 

  • International Call Up
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 3,941
  • Joined: 27-January 08
  • Location:Glasgow
  • Team:Partick Thistle
For all our failings at least we dont come from fucking Paisley.

This post has been edited by Lambie's Pigeon Feed: 16 March 2010 - 18:58


0

#5
User is offline   Dublinjag 

  • Third Division Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,098
  • Joined: 07-September 08
  • Location:Timbuktu
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View Postarchie guevara, on 16 March 2010 - 16:16, said:

Where have you been?

Oh, that's right - the 70s.

Seriously though the OP is spot on. It's death by a thousand balls ups.



Nihilism. Mite as well be listening to Leonard Cohen, Nick Cave and The Doors instead of going to Firhill two or three times a month ...

The OP. Jaysus.

This post has been edited by Dublinjag: 17 March 2010 - 01:06

0

#6
User is offline   Dr Koop 

  • SPL Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 3,168
  • Joined: 06-April 08
  • Location:In bed with a nice Jewish girl
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostOTIG_FTOF, on 16 March 2010 - 15:24, said:

2) PTFC really has been landed with a bunch of useless, incompetent, self-serving, tightfisted idiots who have played musical chairs for over a decade and if listed, a 100+ points could be easily collated over their shortcomings, failures, fk-ups, lack of personal investment, and multiple other items that have ensured PTFC is a club that promised so much, could have been in a much better place than it is now, and 90% of the blame for our current sorry state lies firmly in the hands of current and recently departed individuals who have sat on the PTFC BoD.



I had such high hopes for the thread you've started. Posted Image
In order to save the club it became necessary to destroy it
0

#7
User is offline   Dr Koop 

  • SPL Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 3,168
  • Joined: 06-April 08
  • Location:In bed with a nice Jewish girl
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostDublinjag, on 16 March 2010 - 15:37, said:

Please don't tell me this PropCo deal will not benefit PTFC - as opposed to individuals - in future?



The club has a 50% interest in the propco. It also has one vote, if I understand this right, in decision making. The other partners also have one vote.

I think this'll be a short term benefit but in the long term Thistle will be leaving Firhill.
In order to save the club it became necessary to destroy it
-2

#8
User is offline   Dublinjag 

  • Third Division Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,098
  • Joined: 07-September 08
  • Location:Timbuktu
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostDr Koop, on 17 March 2010 - 13:27, said:

The club has a 50% interest in the propco. It also has one vote, if I understand this right, in decision making. The other partners also have one vote.

I think this'll be a short term benefit but in the long term Thistle will be leaving Firhill.



Yeah, another decade languishing in first division mediocrity before the place gets flogged for peanuts and we move into a mickey-mouse ground (like Clyde's or Dumbarton's) built on wasteland somewhere in the west end. Forever doomed to the second-tier.

This post has been edited by Dublinjag: 17 March 2010 - 15:12

0

#9
User is offline   Dr Koop 

  • SPL Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 3,168
  • Joined: 06-April 08
  • Location:In bed with a nice Jewish girl
  • Team:Partick Thistle
Yip!
In order to save the club it became necessary to destroy it
0

#10
User is offline   OTIG_FTOF 

  • Third Division Apprentice
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 682
  • Joined: 20-September 09
  • Team:Partick Thistle
Just seen first image of proposed phase 1.

Talk about final nail in the b@st@rdisation of a once great stadium!!

Posted Image

This has got to be some kind of joke surely?

I shudder to think what eyesore proposal they will come up with to replace the main stand in phase 2.

Full article HERE (which also contains some even more worrying quotes and bullshit).
1

#11
User is offline   Dr Koop 

  • SPL Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 3,168
  • Joined: 06-April 08
  • Location:In bed with a nice Jewish girl
  • Team:Partick Thistle
Twenty million quid, eh? I wonder how that figure was arrived at. The story doesn't explain. The more I read, the more I'm persuaded that we are indeed going to end up leaving Firhill, sad to say. Posted Image
In order to save the club it became necessary to destroy it
-1

#12
User is offline   Dublinjag 

  • Third Division Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,098
  • Joined: 07-September 08
  • Location:Timbuktu
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostOTIG_FTOF, on 19 March 2010 - 10:13, said:

Just seen first image of proposed phase 1.

Talk about final nail in the b@st@rdisation of a once great stadium!!

Posted Image

This has got to be some kind of joke surely?

I shudder to think what eyesore proposal they will come up with to replace the main stand in phase 2.

Full article HERE (which also contains some even more worrying quotes and bullshit).



Talk about a hotch-potch of a mess. Looks like a bunch of individuals are in for the profit and it's questionable to what extent PTFC will benefit? We'd be better off selling up and constructing a mickey-mouse purpose-built stadium (like Dumbarton's) on wasteland somewhere in the west end. We might as well speed up the inevitable.

Nevermind, it looks like some of those flats will have a good view of the pitch. Hospitality Freebies?

This post has been edited by Dublinjag: 19 March 2010 - 12:47

0

#13
User is offline   vikingTON 

  • Not arrogant, just better
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 39,319
  • Joined: 31-May 07
  • Location:All major multiplexes near you
  • Team:Greenock Morton
Good to see The Herald asking the pressing questions and not at all taking the soft soap approach with the cuddly toy team.

View Postweirdcal, on 01 August 2011 - 11:10, said:

when you think box office you think big and exciting


0

#14
User is offline   ubertube 

  • Third Division Apprentice
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 651
  • Joined: 31-March 08
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostvikingTON, on 19 March 2010 - 16:32, said:

Good to see The Herald asking the pressing questions and not at all taking the soft soap approach with the cuddly toy team.


hacks on the papers never ask thistle difficult questions. if they asked the fans views, took the architects comments or bothered to speak to any commercial/residentail property people they'd get an entirley different story.
0

#15
User is offline   Pie Of The Month 

  • Third Division Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,408
  • Joined: 16-October 09
  • Location:Glasgow
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostOTIG_FTOF, on 19 March 2010 - 10:13, said:

Just seen first image of proposed phase 1.

Talk about final nail in the b@st@rdisation of a once great stadium!!

Posted Image

This has got to be some kind of joke surely?

I shudder to think what eyesore proposal they will come up with to replace the main stand in phase 2.

Full article HERE (which also contains some even more worrying quotes and bullshit).


What's wrong with it really? Apart from wanting a nice 4 sides stadium in an ideal world I don't really see the problem. The bing behind the goals is hardly picturesque and we don't really need a massive stadium considering our recent crowds.
0

#16
User is offline   Lambie's Pigeon Feed 

  • International Call Up
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 3,941
  • Joined: 27-January 08
  • Location:Glasgow
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostPie Of The Month, on 19 March 2010 - 16:56, said:

What's wrong with it really? Apart from wanting a nice 4 sides stadium in an ideal world I don't really see the problem. The bing behind the goals is hardly picturesque and we don't really need a massive stadium considering our recent crowds.


No way back when the board inevitably balls it up.

0

#17
User is offline   Ad Lib 

  • 1 for you 19 for me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 25,663
  • Joined: 12-December 06
  • Location:Jordanhill/Aberdeen
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostOTIG_FTOF, on 19 March 2010 - 10:13, said:

Just seen first image of proposed phase 1.

Talk about final nail in the b@st@rdisation of a once great stadium!!

Posted Image

This has got to be some kind of joke surely?

I shudder to think what eyesore proposal they will come up with to replace the main stand in phase 2.

Full article HERE (which also contains some even more worrying quotes and bullshit).


The architect's plans for the Main Stand (which were far far vaguer than for the City End) was similarly a "3 towers" structure. When McCall said they were going to turn Firhill into a fortress again, I didn't realise that we had turrets in mind.

View PostDr Koop, on 19 March 2010 - 12:25, said:

Twenty million quid, eh? I wonder how that figure was arrived at. The story doesn't explain. The more I read, the more I'm persuaded that we are indeed going to end up leaving Firhill, sad to say. Posted Image


If we leave Firhill, it won't be because we've sold it. The problem with this PropCo development is that it's necessarily restricted in such a way that what land remains inevitably has much less redevelopment/land value.

It's a compromise on every level. We really should have had our act together 4-5 years ago and tried to do a St Mirren with a new stadium over the canal cheaper to run, better proportioned and not designed in such a way as a 3 year old let loose with a box of Lego.
0

#18
User is offline   Dublinjag 

  • Third Division Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,098
  • Joined: 07-September 08
  • Location:Timbuktu
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostvikingTON, on 19 March 2010 - 16:32, said:

Good to see The Herald asking the pressing questions and not at all taking the soft soap approach with the cuddly toy team.



Those people who write stories nowadays are often not reporters. More likely advertising features writers. Different breed. They don't ask questions. They just keep the advertisers happy.
0

#19
User is offline   Dublinjag 

  • Third Division Sub
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Gold Members
  • Posts: 1,098
  • Joined: 07-September 08
  • Location:Timbuktu
  • Team:Partick Thistle

View PostDr Koop, on 17 March 2010 - 13:24, said:

I had such high hopes for the thread you've started. Posted Image



And then DublinJag came along and introduced rock solid common sense and all round enlightened inspiration.

This post has been edited by Dublinjag: 20 March 2010 - 14:03

0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users