[LiviCurryCider]

perthshirebell, on 13 March 2010 - 19:58, said:

If you are looking for spelling mistakes, just take a look at any of your posts. Do you understand how silly your post about Aberdeen, united, chelsea was?

If not ask your hull cyber pal.

That's a bad lie. No, I don't see how it was stupid.

This post has been edited by LiviCurryCider: 13 March 2010 - 20:13

[Sweet Pete]

Traditionally, Nottingham Forest. Currently, Newcastle United.

[BerwickMad]

Willie Gray Ate My Hamster, on 13 March 2010 - 08:21, said:

No way should Liverpool be below Chelsea!!! or evn Arsenal for that matter...

Also Newcastle below Man City despite City having a far better history?

City don't have a far better history though.

Can't really be arsed with bigger club arguements, but Newcastle have won 4 leagues, 6 FA Cups and a European trophy. City have only won 2 leagues and 4 FA Cups. I've no idea how you can say City have a far better history.

As size of clubs go, I would have Newcastle alongside Villa, Everton, Spurs and Leeds. Probably Chelsea too if they weren't bankrolled.

[Willie Gray Ate My Hamster]

BerwickMad, on 14 March 2010 - 17:18, said:

City don't have a far better history though.

Can't really be arsed with bigger club arguements, but Newcastle have won 4 leagues, 6 FA Cups and a European trophy. City have only won 2 leagues and 4 FA Cups. I've no idea how you can say City have a far better history.

As size of clubs go, I would have Newcastle alongside Villa, Everton, Spurs and Leeds. Probably Chelsea too if they weren't bankrolled.

My mistake when I was reading up on the history of Newcastle, misread and thought they had won the second tier 4 times.

[Falcor Roar]

Newcastle for me. Forest have had their time and the best they can do now is get back to lower reaches of the EPL and maybe win the league cup in 15 years. If Newcastle were run properly they could be in the top 6 of England.

[Ade Eyemond]

Barcelona Fan:- We have more members, more season tickets, a higher worldwide profile, are universally lauded for playing football the "right way", constantly praised for our charitable work and are generally considered to be the "good guys"

Real Madrid fan - We have 9 European Cups.


Moral:-

Who gives a f**k who's the "biggest", being the best is all that matters.

This post has been edited by Ade Eyemond: 15 March 2010 - 20:53

[BerwickMad]

Ade Eyemond, on 15 March 2010 - 20:52, said:

Barcelona Fan:- We have more members, more season tickets, a higher worldwide profile, are universally lauded for playing football the "right way", constantly praised for our charitable work and are generally considered to be the "good guys"

Real Madrid fan - We have 9 European Cups.


Moral:-

Who gives a f**k who's the "biggest", being the best is all that matters.

Agree, who gives a f**k, but being the best is not all that matters. I would hate to support a team like Man Utd. The lack of passion during their League Cup win summed it up for me. It would be shit to support a team like that.

[heedthebaa]

BerwickMad, on 15 March 2010 - 21:30, said:

Agree, who gives a f**k, but being the best is not all that matters. I would hate to support a team like Man Utd. The lack of passion during their League Cup win summed it up for me. It would be shit to support a team like that.

it isn't shit like

[LiviCurryCider]

BerwickMad, on 15 March 2010 - 21:30, said:

Agree, who gives a f**k, but being the best is not all that matters. I would hate to support a team like Man Utd. The lack of passion during their League Cup win summed it up for me. It would be shit to support a team like that.

Couldn't agree more. They have just won the first trophy of the season and all the fans can sing is "We want Glazier out!"

[LiviCurryCider]

perthshirebell, on 15 March 2010 - 23:59, said:

ha ha.

Thanks again for your pish

You ask who is the bigger?

Then you agree that who gives a f**k who is the bigger, its all about trophys.


Can i present your unionist arse with the biggest muppet trophy.

You are the biggest spastic on P&B. You are an even bigger spastic than Phantoms-livi-lass. You just make it up as you go along.

Also where the f**k is this trophy?

[chub]

perthshirebell, on 16 March 2010 - 17:11, said:

No you said it was all about trophies and then changed the goalposts.

He often moves the goalposts in arguments he starts, he's not the most clever I must say.

[we are perth]

'Biggest' top 20 English teams for me would be -

1. Man Utd.
2. Liverpool
3. Arsenal
4. Spurs
5. Aston Villa
6. Leeds United
7. Everton
8. Man City
9. Newcastle
10. Chelsea
11. Sunderland
12. Sheff Wed
13. Notts Forest
14. West Ham
15. Wolves
16. Southampton
17. Derby County
18. Birmingham
19. Sheff Utd
20. Blackburn Rovers

This post has been edited by we are perth: 16 March 2010 - 17:56

[Ade Eyemond]

BerwickMad, on 15 March 2010 - 21:30, said:

Agree, who gives a f**k, but being the best is not all that matters. I would hate to support a team like Man Utd. The lack of passion during their League Cup win summed it up for me. It would be shit to support a team like that.

It's your opinion, so I'm not going to say you are "wrong" - but I would saying being the best, or at the very least striving to be so, IS all that matters

[LiviCurryCider]

perthshirebell, on 16 March 2010 - 17:11, said:

No you said it was all about trophies and then changed the goalposts.

Wrong. I agreed with somebody else that Man U fans lacked passion after their win in the Carling Cup final.
It's not exactly all about the trophies, it's more about the history of the club.

[LiviCurryCider]

chub, on 16 March 2010 - 17:20, said:

He often moves the goalposts in arguments he starts, he's not the most clever I must say.

You start.

[Monkey Tennis]

God, what a thread - not in a good way.

Of course Newcastle are bigger - that's so clearly the case due to their much larger support, that there's really no scope for debate.

At some point, someone also managed to place Wigan in a top twenty of English clubs in terms of size.
Another tried to suggest that Forest were "historically" bigger than Newcastle.

Seriously , half the posters on this thread clearly don't really follow football at all, or started about twenty five minutes ago.

[LiviCurryCider]

Monkey Tennis, on 16 March 2010 - 21:07, said:

God, what a thread - not in a good way.

Of course Newcastle are bigger - that's so clearly the case due to their much larger support, that there's really no scope for debate.

At some point, someone also managed to place Wigan in a top twenty of English clubs in terms of size.
Another tried to suggest that Forest were "historically" bigger than Newcastle.

Seriously , half the posters on this thread clearly don't really follow football at all, or started about twenty five minutes ago.

2 European Cups.