[jay_7]

United!!

Clickage

[The Master]

More fool them for paying £20k to an agent

[MDCCCXCIII]

Would have liked him at Dens but we rightly told his agent to do one. Fiscal prudence and all....


Mind you, United fans won't be happy, given that they think he's shite...

[Soccer Dark Blue]

Dundee and Jocky were right to reject the agent's demands of £20k. I admit Pavels is a good player but we have better defenders than him at Dens and we don't need him thank you very much.

[Mr X]

jay_7, on 08 February 2010 - 20:11, said:

United!!

Clickage

Dundee signing targets are funny

[ubertube]

Soccer Dark Blue, on 08 February 2010 - 20:22, said:

Dundee and Jocky were right to reject the agent's demands of £20k. I admit Pavels is a good player but we have better defenders than him at Dens and we don't need him thank you very much.

except if you'd signed him and then he'd have been a great signing and would have been a sign of your spl intentions.

[P45]

Soccer Dark Blue, on 08 February 2010 - 20:22, said:

Dundee and Jocky were right to reject the agent's demands of £20k. I admit Pavels is a good player but we have better defenders than him at Dens and we don't need him thank you very much.

Like who? Lauchlan?

Sounds like Melville has stopped handing out the money if Dundee Utd can sign players that Dundee wanted.

[The Master]

P45, on 08 February 2010 - 20:27, said:

Like who? Lauchlan?

Sounds like Melville has stopped handing out the money if Dundee Utd can sign players that Dundee wanted.

Melville didn't even start "handing out the money" for players. But let's not allow little things like facts to distort the issue.

Also, we were quite right not to hand over £20k to an agent.

[port-ton]

The Master, on 08 February 2010 - 20:28, said:

Melville didn't even start "handing out the money" for players. But let's not allow little things like facts to distort the issue.

Also, we were quite right not to hand over £20k to an agent.

How do you know? you weren't even there.

This post has been edited by port-ton: 08 February 2010 - 20:49

[Drunken Hobo]

I'm not one for digging up old posts, but came across this one (was looking if anybody had an opinion on our new signing):

jay_7, on 04 January 2010 - 16:22, said:

Oh yes because it's not beyond the realms of possibility that a shitty local tabloid is writing that to boost sales, is it? I honestly can't fuckin' wait for the end of the transfer window so I can rub it right in that Mihadjuks didn't sign. Again.

I have to hand it to you, you're a man of your word.

[The Master]

port-ton, on 08 February 2010 - 20:49, said:

How do you know? you weren't even there.

Yes. Very witty. Have a coconut.

[port-ton]

The Master, on 08 February 2010 - 20:54, said:

Yes. Very witty. Have a coconut.

Thanks a bunch.

[Nizzy]

The Master, on 08 February 2010 - 20:28, said:

Melville didn't even start "handing out the money" for players. But let's not allow little things like facts to distort the issue.

I thought it had been established that the cash used to sign Harkins and Griffiths came from Clum.

[The Master]

Nizzy, on 08 February 2010 - 21:25, said:

I thought it had been established that the cash used to sign Harkins and Griffiths came from Clum.

No.

The cash for Harkins and Griffiths came from Burnley.

[Desert Nomad]

Less of this pish. Is the player actually any good? We desperately need cover at the back after injuries to Dixon, Kova & Webster, not to mention big Wilkie, who`ll prob not be back now.

[P45]

The Master, on 08 February 2010 - 20:28, said:

Melville didn't even start "handing out the money" for players. But let's not allow little things like facts to distort the issue.

Also, we were quite right not to hand over £20k to an agent.

Yes you are right. He got a lovely stadium in return for the money he donated.

[Nizzy]

The Master, on 08 February 2010 - 21:26, said:

No.

The cash for Harkins and Griffiths came from Burnley.

So what plugged the 'black hole'? I thought that was the Burnley cash.

[The Master]

Nizzy, on 08 February 2010 - 21:40, said:

So what plugged the 'black hole'? I thought that was the Burnley cash.

No, the Cup game against Celtic saw to that.

This season, League Cup games against Aberdeen and Rangers will more than plug the gap. A favourable quarter-final draw in the Scottish Cup could even see us turn a profit this year.

This post has been edited by The Master: 08 February 2010 - 21:43

[G_Man1985]

Soccer Dark Blue, on 08 February 2010 - 20:22, said:

Dundee and Jocky were right to reject the agent's demands of £20k. I admit Pavels is a good player but we have better defenders than him at Dens and we don't need him thank you very much.

Like who? We have Mckenzie and thats about it.

[Nizzy]

So Clum's put minimal amounts of money into Dundee then?

[Yogie_dee]

Soccer Dark Blue, on 08 February 2010 - 20:22, said:

Dundee and Jocky were right to reject the agent's demands of £20k. I admit Pavels is a good player but we have better defenders than him at Dens and we don't need him thank you very much.

Considering that Gary MacKenzie will probably be away in summer along with Lauchlan. That leaves us with Cowan, Benny and McKewan, we do need him.

[The Master]

Nizzy, on 08 February 2010 - 21:44, said:

So Clum's put minimal amounts of money into Dundee then?

He has invested an amount.

But he brings business acumen to the table more than anything else.

[The Arch]

G_Man1985, on 08 February 2010 - 21:42, said:

Like who? We have Mckenzie and thats about it.

David Cowan would get a game for any team in the first division.

[RiG]

Soccer Dark Blue, on 08 February 2010 - 20:22, said:

Dundee and Jocky were right to reject the agent's demands of £20k. I admit Pavels is a good player but we have better defenders than him at Dens and we don't need him thank you very much.

I doubt that you do. Not from what I've seen from Dundee this season. Admittedly it isn't much but he would instantly become one of the best defenders in the league if he had signed for you.

[Muggy]

The Arch, on 08 February 2010 - 21:46, said:

David Cowan would get a game for any team in the first division.

Certainly Partick Thistle...