[Scotty Tunbridge]

Hooked as he couldn't handle the Paixao Power!

[RiG]

bcoxk76, on 10 February 2010 - 21:12, said:

amazing debut for him then haha! only 2 0 down at half time ya muppets haha

You're trying too hard.

[bcoxk76]

ohhhhhhhhhhh look at that just been subbed off! great player! made a massive difference 2nite against bottom of the table Hamilton haha, come on the HIBBBBS

[Desert Nomad]

1st impressions, way out of his depth.

[RiG]

Even if that does turn out to be the case I still think it's hilarious that he rejected Dundee after we were told how they were about to sign him on about 3 different occasions.

[Drunken Hobo]

Desert Nomad, on 10 February 2010 - 22:30, said:

1st impressions, way out of his depth.

Wasn't any worse than the others at the back, possibly our best defender tonight. Not saying much though.

Totally exposed for the second goal though, it was 2 on 1 but 2 Hamilton attackers against 1 United defender. No-one came to help him!

[chipie1983]

Drunken Hobo, on 10 February 2010 - 23:24, said:

Wasn't any worse than the others at the back, possibly our best defender tonight. Not saying much though.

Totally exposed for the second goal though, it was 2 on 1 but 2 Hamilton attackers against 1 United defender. No-one came to help him!

Would agree with that. Completely baffled as to why he was hooked instead of Dods. It could have been any of the four of them! Despite that, i've every confidence he'll come good for us.

[shedboy82]

Rabbit in the headlights.

[Szamo's_Ammo]

He reminded me of a defensive Robbie Keane. I'll pass judgement once he gets a few games and is played in the correct position. Dods needs disposed of as soon as possible.

[TamPepper]

RiG, on 10 February 2010 - 22:31, said:

Even if that does turn out to be the case I still think it's hilarious that he rejected Dundee after we were told how they were about to sign him on about 3 different occasions.

Jocky told him to get lost, just as well.

[False Light]

chipie1983, on 11 February 2010 - 00:31, said:

Would agree with that. Completely baffled as to why he was hooked instead of Dods. It could have been any of the four of them! Despite that, i've every confidence he'll come good for us.

I imagine he was lacking match fitness. I thought he started not too badly and then it all went to f**k for everyone. I don't think it's fair to judge him on that game given what he had to play alongside. He looked really thin though 

[bcoxk76]

you imagined wrong, has been playing all season for his old club

[Pull My Strings]

Far, far, far too early to judge the guy. He only signed for the club the previous day and can barely have trained with the rest of the team before going straight into the starting line up. I'll agree that he wasn't particularly impressive but neither was anyone else on Wednesday and there are strong mitigating factors. I'll give him a few weeks before I start to judge whether he's a player or not.

Dees: pile on. No one likes to be knocked back so it's only fair that you vent your little spleens at the awfy man. Bless.

[Drunken Hobo]

bcoxk76, on 12 February 2010 - 18:08, said:

you imagined wrong, has been playing all season for his old club

Ignoring the fact that the season ended in November?

[Ludo *1]

RiG, on 10 February 2010 - 22:31, said:

Even if that does turn out to be the case I still think it's hilarious that he rejected Dundee after we were told how they were about to sign him on about 3 different occasions.

Quote

Dees: pile on. No one likes to be knocked back so it's only fair that you vent your little spleens at the awfy man. Bless.

Either people are at the wind-up here or they are just very stupid. We rejected Mihadjuks, TWICE not down to playing ability (For all I know he can be Premiership class) but for pussy-footing about.

[EhMindohGillie]

Ludo *1, on 12 February 2010 - 20:20, said:

Either people are at the wind-up here or they are just very stupid. We rejected Mihadjuks, TWICE not down to playing ability (For all I know he can be Premiership class) but for pussy-footing about.

You just know the dabs will be defending this guy come what may.

[Pull My Strings]

Ludo *1, on 12 February 2010 - 20:20, said:

Either people are at the wind-up here or they are just very stupid. We rejected Mihadjuks, TWICE not down to playing ability (For all I know he can be Premiership class) but for pussy-footing about.

That's right, you dumped him first. Pride intact, not bitter, moving on to bigger and better things.

[EhMindohGillie]

Mihadjuks hooked at half-time today, nae wonder the arabs are quietly hoping this thread goes away

[gav-ffc]

Good enough for Dundee by the sounds of it.

[Ludo *1]

gav-ffc, on 13 February 2010 - 21:29, said:

Good enough for Dundee by the sounds of it.

Pity we won't see your lot next season on your way down.