[Farrah Swango]

On reporting Scotland Craig Levein and Jocky Scott say they think it could happen for the teams. I personally think both teams would benefit from a purpose built stadium. Would the fans be against it?

I'm sure this topic has been done to death, but so has everything else on this forum

[Ludo *1]

No it will simply never happen. Dundee fans wouldn't go to Tannadice and United fans would not go to Dens. The only way forward would be a brand new stadium but even then I think that the fans ultimately (And Scotland's hosting hopes) would decide whether that would go ahead. United are only interested in this due to the fact they are in so much debt.

[rossyboy]

Boring Boring Boring, this has been said for years, No it will never ever happen.
Move on,
Next caller!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!

[vikingTON]

Only one of the club's own their ground so they could do it tomorrow if it suited them. And they would if it was to their mutual benefit, whether the fans liked it or not.

This post has been edited by vikingTON: 26 November 2009 - 19:18

[Murray-7]

I think it would be absolutely fine. Its hardly an ultra fierce rivalry

[chico]

too sensible an idea. it'll never happen.

[Farrah Swango]

I'm sure they could build one that could generate each of them more money off the field. If it was shown that they would both benefit more than they do currently, they'd be foolish to turn such a proposal down.

[Ludo *1]

vikingTON, on Nov 26 2009, 19:18, said:

Only one of the club's own their ground so they could do it tomorrow if it suited them. And they would if it was to their mutual benefit, whether the fans liked it or not.

No they wouldn't. Mass protests and United need all the money they can get and I'm not sure Melville would be too well liked.

We are 'The People's' club.

[Lambies_Apprentice]

They should go one better and merge.

[Ludo *1]

Lambies_Apprentice, on Nov 26 2009, 19:25, said:

They should go one better and merge.

The reel in begins.

[Drunken Hobo]

Not in our climate, the pitch would end up like a ploughed field and the SPL/SFA would probably still arrange fixtures on the same date. Wouldn't mind a share of a newly built stadium but am happy enough with Tannadice and the Dees are happy enough with their loan of Dens.

[mortonbouncy]

would be a logical step but what team would win the deal to supply the "pehs"?

[vikingTON]

Ludo *1, on Nov 26 2009, 19:23, said:

No they wouldn't. Mass protests and United need all the money they can get and I'm not sure Melville would be too well liked.

We are 'The People's' club.

Both Dundee and United would sell their grannies for a net income of £1million more over the course of a few seasons. They'd certainly shaft the Derry Loyal without a moment's hesitation.

This post has been edited by vikingTON: 26 November 2009 - 20:08

[silvery tay]

vikingTON, on Nov 26 2009, 19:18, said:

Only one of the club's own their ground so they could do it tomorrow if it suited them. And they would if it was to their mutual benefit, whether the fans liked it or not.

Not a chance Utd are fcukin' skint ...........................these cnuts tried to finish us off when we were in admin.................why the fcuk would we bail these fcukers out now ?........aint gonna happen

[Desert Nomad]

mortonbouncy, on Nov 26 2009, 20:01, said:

would be a logical step but what team would win the deal to supply the "pehs"?

Pray to f**k it`s no ours anyway! Greasy, minging, pish.

[vikingTON]

silvery tay, on Nov 26 2009, 20:13, said:

Not a chance Utd are fcukin' skint

... so they would shaft their fans for any financial benefit.

[The Master]

Drunken Hobo, on Nov 26 2009, 19:46, said:

...SPL/SFA...

Fucking hell, people on this site are right thick c***s

[silvery tay]

vikingTON, on Nov 26 2009, 20:08, said:

Both Dundee and United would sell their grannies for a net income of £1million more over the course of a few seasons. They'd certainly shaft the Derry Loyal without a moment's hesitation.

United till July

[Desert Nomad]

The Master, on Nov 26 2009, 20:16, said:

Fucking hell, people on this site are right thick c***s

And I suppose you have a fucking clue who runs the game in this country? Pedantic little fucker that you are.

[Drunken Hobo]

The Master, on Nov 26 2009, 20:16, said:

Fucking hell, people on this site are right thick c***s

Sorry, I meant SFL of course, momentary lapse in my usually unfallable infallible brilliance.

[silvery tay]

vikingTON, on Nov 26 2009, 20:16, said:

... so they would shaft their fans for any financial benefit.

They would...................................
.
























































Imaterial though because the main team in Dundee COULDNA' GIE A FCUK ABOOT THE ARAB CNUTS

[Monkey Tennis]

Nah, bad idea which I hope is never realised.

Two large(ish) grounds on the same street is one of the great quirks of Scottish football.
These things matter and are worth preserving.

It would be sad to see this change so that a few quid could be saved and both sides could play on a crappy surface in a soulless place that was probably too big for them.

This post has been edited by Monkey Tennis: 26 November 2009 - 21:03

[Ludo *1]

vikingTON, on Nov 26 2009, 20:08, said:

Both Dundee and United would sell their grannies for a net income of £1million more over the course of a few seasons. They'd certainly shaft the Derry Loyal without a moment's hesitation.

Doubt we'd make that much money in the first 5-10 year due to the fact fans would be so against it. Remember, Dundee fans boycotted when the Marrs were APPOINTED and some haven't came back since. We are a fickle bunch.

[Captain_Sensible]

What would be the point?

The land both grounds are built on are virtually worthless...... just like Dundee's promotion hopes.

[Ludo *1]

Captain_Sensible, on Nov 26 2009, 20:38, said:

What would be the point?

The land both grounds are built on are virtually worthless...... just like Dundee's promotion hopes.

You ain't very good at this 'winding up business' maybe you should stick to attacking the OF, they seem easy prey.