[bluetooner]

StewartyMac, on Sep 14 2009, 20:22, said:

Looking like a bad move, Bills 14-7 up with 3 mins left in the 1st half.

And Pats have been poor. If you had stayed with the Bills - im confident the Pats would be up by 20 by now.

[StewartyMac]

Oh look, the Pats won and never covered the spread...like I thought originally before inexplicably changing my mind.

Always stick with your first answer, kids.

[Shengus Khan]

And I finish off week 1 propping up the table

Just finding my feet folks, honest!

[Reluctant Hero]

Went for 11 underdogs this week.

I mean, how are Philly favourites to beat Brees & co?

[bluetooner]

Reluctant Hero, on Sep 16 2009, 16:50, said:

Went for 11 underdogs this week.

I mean, how are Philly favourites to beat Brees & co?

There was a lot of large spreads for the underdogs, but haven't picked that many..........


Some very difficult picks i think.

[Shengus Khan]

bluetooner, on Sep 16 2009, 22:36, said:

Some very difficult picks i think.

I would say so. I think at least 4 of my picks were the toss of a coin.

7 underdogs for me this week.

[StewartyMac]

Gone for 10 underdogs this week. It's been a very difficult week to pick selections, though.

This post has been edited by StewartyMac: 17 September 2009 - 11:10

[Skyline Drifter]

Mmm, well I went mostly for favourites so either I'm going to trail miles behind after a fortnight or be right back in it it would seem!

(Or more likely we'll each get half right and be no different to how we are now!).

[bluetooner]

Skyline Drifter, on Sep 17 2009, 06:18, said:

Mmm, well I went mostly for favourites so either I'm going to trail miles behind after a fortnight or be right back in it it would seem!

(Or more likely we'll each get half right and be no different to how we are now!).

Hopefully it is the middle choice

[Skyline Drifter]

Skyline Drifter, on Sep 17 2009, 11:18, said:

Mmm, well I went mostly for favourites so either I'm going to trail miles behind after a fortnight or be right back in it it would seem!

(Or more likely we'll each get half right and be no different to how we are now!).

This really isn't going well at all!

Still, on the positive side of things the Jets are winning against New England in the 4th qtr.

This post has been edited by Skyline Drifter: 20 September 2009 - 20:48

[Shengus Khan]

It's funny you should write that SD but I was just having a quick look at some of my picks. I think i'm good in 6 of the 9 games that are on just now but I was in a similar position last week and ended up with a measly total so i'm definitely not getting ahead of myself just yet.

[StewartyMac]

I'm up on 5/9 so far, thanks to the Chiefs scoring a TD.

Reasonable.

[StewartyMac]

StewartyMac, on Sep 20 2009, 20:56, said:

I'm up on 5/9 so far, thanks to the Chiefs scoring a TD.

Reasonable.

Aaargh, Oakland have just scored a TD in the last minute, bloody Russell throws four passes all afternoon, then goes 80 yards in about 5 plays to get the TD.

[StewartyMac]

Jim Pansy's having a stormer this week, looks like he's 8-1 for the early games so far.

[bluetooner]

StewartyMac, on Sep 20 2009, 16:03, said:

Aaargh, Oakland have just scored a TD in the last minute, bloody Russell throws four passes all afternoon, then goes 80 yards in about 5 plays to get the TD.

Think that just got me 6 out of the 9. Not bad, but not good enough i think.

[Skyline Drifter]

Just 3 of the first 9 for me. Game's a bogey already!

[Savage Henry]

StewartyMac, on Sep 20 2009, 20:05, said:

Jim Pansy's having a stormer this week, looks like he's 8-1 for the early games so far.

I'll almost certainly go 0 for 1000 from here on in.

[Skyline Drifter]

I see I've managed to go clear at the bottom now!

I think the "three-peat" may be beyond me already.

[kaos1874]

10 correct last week
11 correct so far this week

do keep up!!

This post has been edited by kaos1874: 21 September 2009 - 11:38

[StewartyMac]

Skyline Drifter, on Sep 21 2009, 09:46, said:

I see I've managed to go clear at the bottom now!

Not quite. The overall totals haven't been calculated yet, but I make you on the same points as Jambo Stu, and just one behind me.

[bluetooner]

StewartyMac, on Sep 21 2009, 07:21, said:

Not quite. The overall totals haven't been calculated yet, but I make you on the same points as Jambo Stu, and just one behind me.

With worst week dropped, everyone now has a worst week, so there is only 1 weeks of scores showing.

[Skyline Drifter]

StewartyMac, on Sep 21 2009, 12:21, said:

Not quite. The overall totals haven't been calculated yet, but I make you on the same points as Jambo Stu, and just one behind me.

Those ARE the overall totals. It's already dropping out the worst week. I'm bottom, leave me to my misery.

[StewartyMac]

Aaah, I see. I thought they would have taken that off at the end, rather than it be ongoing.

[StewartyMac]

Well, it was a rubbish week for me, but looking at the other predictions, I was the only one to predict the Bears-Steelers game correctly. I should get bonus points for that

[bluetooner]

StewartyMac, on Sep 21 2009, 09:56, said:

Well, it was a rubbish week for me, but looking at the other predictions, I was the only one to predict the Bears-Steelers game correctly. I should get bonus points for that

You don't get bonus points for picking out a team by mistake.