dogma, on Apr 13 2009, 09:14, said:
Aye the club teams will be desperate to release players for a friendly on the other side of the world. There will be massive call offs rendering the whole exercise pointless.
Maybe - but if we're in the play-offs, surely players will be wanting to secure their place? And to pull out with a dubious injury (which Burley etc. would be aware of) could jeopardise that place.
dogma, on Apr 13 2009, 09:14, said:
We would probably better either not playing a game, or playing against someone useless closer to home if only to have all the players together. If we go round the world with guys who wont be in the play offs it wont be a useful preparation. Even if we do play a minnow it might engender some confidence in the players.
If we'd been able to, for example, host Northern Ireland or Croatia, then South Africa, it would be better to stay home. But I'd expect Croatia will go outside of Europe; and South Africa turned us down (in favour of Norway and Iceland). Plus we could draw one of those sides in the play-offs, in which case you'd have to cancel it... Plus we played Northern Ireland not that long ago, IIRC.
dogma, on Apr 13 2009, 09:14, said:
I honestly dont know why the SFA has waited until now to sort something out given that we were never going to be winning this group. As soon as the draw was made a game should have been arranged.
They could not have done anything earlier. Aside from those handful of European teams, the only free nations of calibre were South Africa and New Zealand. There will be some Asian nations free, but it would have been impossible until recently to know which. As I said above, if Japan have a nightmare in their remaining games, they might finish 3rd and need to cancel our friendly. (Which would be a source of HUGE embarrassment to the SFA...). As soon as South Africa didn't want to play us the only options were (1) going to Asia or (2) just staying at home and playing 1 minnow.